我的第一對座地喇叭triangle genese quartet入宮了

joey.minihouse

very good

PP-HK

PP-HK, 有新野玩, 所以車都唔出, enjoy
edhuen 發表於 2011-4-26 01:08

唔係呢, 因為放隻新喇叭要執屋, 除左原來既雜物外, 個十仔要搬位, 又順手清除hifi架後冇用既線, 仲要搞埋清潔, 新喇叭攞位加釘都係一個人做, 酸痛左兩日呀, 就算出黎都踩唔到了, 下次請番你飲茶賠罪啦。

mchim3010

回復 1# PP-HK
師兄你的分享十分詳盡，我睇左差唔多半個鐘...我無得買有得睇都好開心

ekylam

PP-HK Ching, I'm using 806S too with Nait XS and CD5XS! I found this is quite matched and be honest, I am addicted to JMLab's mid and high pitch sound, which other brand of speakers can't deliver (they may have their own strength). But your report on Triangle Quartet can give me some insight when I plan the speakers upgrade... pls output more report once they are run in. Enjoy!

PP-HK

回復  PP-HK
師兄你的分享十分詳盡，我睇左差唔多半個鐘...我無得買有得睇都好開心 ...
mchim3010 發表於 2011-4-26 22:23

我打左幾個鐘嗱, 多謝你耐心觀看。

mchim3010

回復 25# PP-HK


     小弟同師兄比，簡宜九牛一毛

Lok80

勁呀!! PP-HK ching 你個報告詳細到我都想即刻去試下 Triangle......但
不過將來可以考慮upgrade......多謝分享!!!

我想問下 "boom"係咪即係拍邊呀?

PP-HK

PP-HK Ching, I'm using 806S too with Nait XS and CD5XS! I found this is quite matched and be honest, ...
ekylam 發表於 2011-4-27 00:11

如果你鍾意jmlab既聲底, 咁triangle都可以一試, 因為聲底好接近, 只是取向有所不同。jm會較為注重中、高頻, 而triangle則較為平均, 低頻會強過jm, 兩者的音色都屬甜美一類。806s我用左好多年了, 音色好特別係中頻好好味, 咁既價錢好難搵到代替。但佢有兩個問題, 第一是分析力唔夠, 換上quartet後真係聽多左好多野, 尤其是d樂器聲以前雖然都係聽到, 但而家係好有層次咁表現出黎, 細微聲亦出多了很多。其次, 806s的聲音係較為不離箱, 擴散性就triangle表現好一點。如果想upgrade可以去試下trio丫, 你會發覺佢俾到好多以前對喇叭俾唔到你既野架。而家trio二手都係10k左右, c/p value好高。

PP-HK

回復  PP-HK


     小弟同師兄比，簡宜九牛一毛
mchim3010 發表於 2011-4-27 11:08

    講笑啦。

PP-HK

勁呀!! PP-HK ching 你個報告詳細到我都想即刻去試下 Triangle......但
不過將來可以考慮upgrade. ...
Lok80 發表於 2011-4-27 11:09

    boom唔同拍邊, boom係指低頻的駐波問題, 令到空間充斥著"hum"聲, 拍邊係amp的推動力超越喇叭單元的承受力的現象。