Wilmer威馬 發表於 2012-3-10 15:31 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
so I just choice the connection that the voice is my cup of tea is then ok?{:1_332:} yeah{:6_193:} so I just choice the connection that the voice is my cup of tea is then ok?
HOHOHO 發表於 2012-3-10 15:45 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
bingo 這牌喇叭係古怪少少…
若找到方法如何好聲d已是萬幸 這牌喇叭係古怪少少…
若找到方法如何好聲d已是萬幸
stamp 發表於 2012-3-10 23:32 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
"這牌喇叭係古怪少少"........................why have such impression? Lot of A product in the market!!! 回復 65# HOHOHO
收到你PM, 等緊你覆, 因為唔太明你點駁, 不過照估左你個問題先.
你對PROAC STUDIO 115, 其實比PROAC STUDIO 110好, 因為轉左用TABLETTE高音, 代替左以前果隻REFERENCE 8, 清通英國聲底, 唔太難推. 至於ATOLL, 我之前用ATOLL 前後級, SPEC黎講, 後級多你部IN100SE 20W, 用VOVOX INITIO行BI-WIRE去推對805S, 比起行SINGLE WIRE, D野會提升左, 不過事隔太耐,而且只比較過一次, 唔記得DETAIL, 但最記得係音場會撐得開好多. 而且日本仔都係用ATOLL去夾DYNA的,所以ATOLL力水唔係問題. 當然, 如之前師兄講, 如果部AMP唔夠力水, 行BI-WIRE係會仲衰聲, 不過唔係你個CASE, 唔駛擔心. {:1_253:}
所以我估問題,應該在於你條SC. 你呢條SC,無睇錯應該係入門級, 質素一般, 2.5MM粗已夠用. 依家行BI-WIRE, 兩條加埋就會變得太粗, 加上條線質素一般, 就會粗聲同慢聲底, 一多野就會唔清唔錯. 所以你都係行番SINGLE WIRE, 正插高音上邊, 負插底音再試. 呢個牌子, 好D既型號係用幾條單支銅一組的.
可惜我條VOVOX BI-WIRE賣左俾人, 無得借俾你玩. 若果仲係搞唔掂, 你拎對喇叭番去牛羊, 叫農夫用100SE行BI-WIRE SHOW俾你睇.{:1_253:} 回復HOHOHO
收到你PM, 等緊你覆, 因為唔太明你點駁, 不過照估左你個問題先.
你對PROAC STUDIO 115, 其 ...
dunce 發表於 2012-3-23 02:14 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Thank you very much for your detail explanation!
唔太明你點駁, just as showed picture but the two wire (high & low) of each channel are join together before enter the amp.
回復 67# HOHOHO
你之前試左3個駁法.
1. 低頻位蕉插入經原廠JUMPER到高頻無問題,高中聲清甜!
2. 但高頻位蕉插入經原廠JUMPER到低頻後,高中聲变得明顯,低頻亦無改善?
3. 高+ 低頻位蕉插齊入BI-WIRE,移去原廠JUMPER,更衰聲,何解? (經雙線聯合從單一位AMP輸出的)
我想知1同2既駁法.
Re: [討論] Bi-wire更衰聲?何解?
回復HOHOHO收到你PM, 等緊你覆, 因為唔太明你點駁, 不過照估左你個問題先.
你對PROAC STUDIO 115, 其 ...
<font color="#999999">dunce 發表於 2012-3-23 02:14</font>
Thank you very much for your detail explanation!
唔太明你點駁, just as showed picture but the two wire (high & low) of each channel are join together before enter the amp.
http://www.post76.com/discuss/attachment.php?aid=MzE5NzM0fDFiZjQxNDRifDEzMzI0NzMxMjJ8ZDdiMVBuOFBRWHB0UnpnYlpHMTVmV0wrbGQ3UmxqeFd6WVUrUG56WHhKZVIrdnM%3D
令晚影張相比你
- 發送自我的 Galaxy Nexus 大板凳應用 回復HOHOHO
你之前試左3個駁法.
1. 低頻位蕉插入經原廠JUMPER到高頻無問題,高中聲清甜!
2. 但高頻位 ...
dunce 發表於 2012-3-23 11:25 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
1. just single wire both+ and - to low freq position = good effect
2. just single wireboth+ and - to high freq position = very poor effect!
3. bi wire four input with remove jumper = very very poor effect!!!