如果用2萬內合併機, 基本上你用single wire比你bi-wire仲好聲, 好多時部機未必夠力(即維持2組穩定輸出+力水 ...
silvermoon 發表於 2012-3-10 10:08 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
good explanation{:1_351:}
but even I use single wire "low freq input" much better than single wire "high freq input", why?{:1_332:}
I think you should check your bi wire cable is it bad contact between cable and plug!
or just remove all spk cable plugs to try again!
小弟都係甘玩，冇依個情況出现
高低頻仲拉濶左去得盡D
不過小弟係用對cheap cheap 書架
I think you should check your bi wire cable is it bad contact between cable and plug!
edison133 發表於 2012-3-10 10:21 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
of course not this reason, otherewise no so many ching have different conclusion (they may have the same problem but have differnet conclusion by themself)
HOHOHO 發表於 2012-3-9 18:40 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
這條 In-akustik 是廠線還是diy散線{:1_342:} 用第2個方法時, 有無試過兩條線對掉 {:1_342:}
這條 In-akustik 是廠線還是diy散線 用第2個方法時, 有無試過兩條線對掉...
ANWKLO 發表於 2012-3-10 10:35 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
DIY
the main issue:
1. why even I use single wire "low freq input" much better than single wire "high freq input",
2.single wire low input > single wire high input >>> bi-wire???
如果用2萬內合併機, 基本上你用single wire比你bi-wire仲好聲, 好多時部機未必夠力(即維持2組穩定輸出+力水 ...
silvermoon 發表於 2012-3-10 10:08 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
一條友本身做開一樣野,而家又要佢做多樣野,咁個效率又點會好呢 !{:6_188:}
DIY
the main issue:
1. why even I use single wire "low freq input" much better than single wire "h ...
HOHOHO 發表於 2012-3-10 10:39 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
just interesting, you have twospeaker cable, right? one in fork and one in banana or else?
本帖最後由 silvermoon 於 2012-3-10 11:15 編輯
good explanation
but even I use single wire "low freq input" much better than singl ...
HOHOHO 發表於 2012-3-10 10:20 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
好有可能係Jumper影響
LF->HF; HF->LF 已經係兩件事
對於你所講單純接駁LF比起其他方案好, 引用師兄所講, 高中音清甜
但接駁HF時情況大大不同...
以小弟的睇法
高中音要好, 唔係單純俾夠能量/靚線俾HF就好; 要高中好, 低音好係首要條件, 點解我咁講?
當對喇叭低音線條唔清, 一舊舊, 試問你又點會聽到好的高中音呢?
以師兄接駁LF時覺得最好聲的原因, 因為低音有足夠能量, 線條較清, 令到高中音都較為清晰
接駁HF時覺得差, 我相信係正常情況下高中音一定較好, 但此時你用原裝Jumper (HF->LF), 試問原裝Jumper質素有幾高? 可以傳到幾多energy俾LF呢? 結果低音濛, 覆蓋左高中音, 做成師兄覺得插HF俾LF差的主因
至於Bi-wire, 不夠力推, 低音唔夠能量, 高音又唔得, 點會出到好聲?
對現時情況黎睇,
1. single wire -> LF 最好聲 [因低音線條最清(應該)]
1/2. single wire -> cross pattern [可能俾單純LF好聲, 師兄要試試]
3. single wire -> HF
4. Bi-wire 最差
當師兄買左對靚Jumper時
1. single wire -> cross pattern
2. single wire -> LF/HF (睇師兄取向)
3. Bi-wire
再加上師兄用緊ProAc, 話曬ProAc都有返咁上下質素, 如果要玩bi-wire, 真係玩前後級分體先好玩
