Nht Classic Three & Classic Two C 的100個鐘後...

claero

Pioneer amp最衰既地方係無得逐隻speaker較分頻點, 無用盡隻speaker

yamaha can't 逐隻較 as well, i set 90 ,because my surround said only reach 78 .(afaird too 抆)will lose some of them .

再唔係整個"THX規格"去試下(即係全部small)

for me its better , the layer more detail .

i listen mk in the show that day , i guess they use at least 100 or 120 cross .....

the disc they try that day(28 weeks later) , the helicopter sound from woofer , not from front , it really depends which way u like , please tell me the result when u try it.

cakecake

Pioneer amp最衰既地方係無得逐隻speaker較分頻點, 無用盡隻speaker

yamaha can't 逐隻較 as well, i set 90 ,because my surround said only reach 78 .(afaird too 抆)will lose some of them .

再唔係整個"THX ...
claero 發表於 2009-8-10 21:35

嗯, 我會再分享的....
唔好笑小弟新手Report就得啦~

maner394

嗯, 我會再分享的....
唔好笑小弟新手Report就得啦~
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-10 21:59

cake兄講笑咩，你ＤReport 毒害萬千網民， 仲點算新手呀！

cakecake

cake兄講笑咩，你ＤReport 毒害萬千網民， 仲點算新手呀！
maner394 發表於 2009-8-10 22:04

Maner兄誇獎了...
只要各師兄"奶"毒"奶"得happy...
毒死都死得甘心就得啦.....

maner394

Maner兄誇獎了...
只要各師兄"奶"毒"奶"得happy...
毒死都死得甘心就得啦.....
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-10 22:17

一Ｄ都唔誇，當日先鋒 5.1耳筒個份 report，真係死傷無數，繼而再黎 MA 喇叭，連我細佬同線王都係死在你手上

cakecake

一Ｄ都唔誇，當日先鋒 5.1耳筒個份 report，真係死傷無數，繼而再黎 MA 喇叭，連我細佬同線王都係死在你手上
maner394 發表於 2009-8-10 22:42

Maner兄真係太誇獎了, 小弟受之有愧..
不過隻Pioneer SE-DRS3000C 5.1耳筒 , 我都知真係毒死左好多人...

其實不論Pioneer AV amp, Pioneer 5.1耳筒, 甚至係MA speaker都好...
係佢本身真係有料到, 效果係得...
如果本身質數真係唔ok的話, 小弟點樣講都無用呢....

maner394

Maner兄真係太誇獎了, 小弟受之有愧..
不過隻Pioneer SE-DRS3000C 5.1耳筒 , 我都知真係毒死左好多人...

其實不論Pioneer AV amp, Pioneer 5.1耳筒, 甚至係MA speaker都好...
係佢本身真係有 ...
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-10 22:57

講得啱......最緊要件產品得，唔係送比你都無用！

cakecake

咁睇pioneer and yamaha 既bass management 就"媽夫"少少. Onkyo 都可以遂隻set. 你一係用全set同model speakers, 吾係就要就前面LCR. pioneer and yamaha 高階D amp會吾會好D? Sony 9000es bass management and E ...
ryanenen 發表於 2009-8-11 10:14

Pioneer amp既MCACC係勁...不過連咁基本既野都無真係那個左少少.....
Sony amp....唉....我都想換STR-DA5400ES.......

cakecake

經過一星期後再較機...
分別用左以下幾個方法較:
1.) Front: Large, Center: Small, Surround:Small, Sub: Plus, xOver:50

2.)Front: Large, Center: Small, Surround:Small, Sub: Plus, xOver:80

3.)Front: Small, Center: Small, Surround:Small, Sub: Yes

4.)Front: Large, Center: Large, Surround:Small, Sub: Plus, xOver:80

第1.個方法: 50Hz做crossover(前置最低週為45Hz +/- 3db), 所以超高分析力, 不過低音就...............(crossover太抆了..)

第2.3.4.個方法: 其實效果相似...但淸析度, 不論高音和低音, 方法4.為最好
淸析度排序以下4.>2.>3.
"THX規格"(全small)低音係好, 但高中音就濛D...

4.就因為中置set "Large", 多番幾10 h聽下, 中置既聲出番D...

唔....試多次方法1.較多次先.....用EQ推爆佢60Hz.....

sammer425

經過一星期後再較機...
分別用左以下幾個方法較:
1.) Front: Large, Center: Small, Surround:Small, Sub: Plus, xOver:50

2.)Front: Large, Center: Small, Surround:Small, Sub: Plus, xOver:80

3.)Front: Small ...
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-16 09:06

較 EQ 對我黎講太高階了  , 我都想學