Bi-wire更衰聲？何解？

HOHOHO

「但高頻位蕉插入經原廠JUMPER到低頻後，高中聲变得？明顯，低頻亦無改善？」
「高+ 低頻位蕉插齊入BI-W ...
nicknick 發表於 2012-3-9 20:12

    第1句一個關鍵字：高中聲變得not明顯。 I don't know why!

第3個bi-wire的option，如果真係咁差，我只可以估計是你條喇叭線未run-in或者質素仲差過原廠jumper: may be the real cause

HOHOHO

Bi-wire it should be better sound quality...
can'r understand why sound become worst..?{:6_ ...
chinkc 發表於 2012-3-9 20:59

amp is atoll 100se

HOHOHO

行bi wire哀聲咗，咪你部amp唔夠力出。
ckw3031 發表於 2012-3-9 21:20

    amp唔夠力出???
100 w per channel may be enough la

HOHOHO

ho ching 係唔係應該比一點耐性等部amp run好先呢,我唔知你係用咩電源線有冇足夠power比部amp食,但係部amp ...
sungyue 發表於 2012-3-9 22:04

your answer may be the most correst one

ckw3031

Atoll 100se推proAc studio 115，應該唔係問題呀？喇叭線又唔算好粗！！
cheapching 發表於 2012-3-9 22:12

咁行single就當然冇問題喇，樓主話行bi wire就衰聲、暗晒，咁咪就係唔夠力比bi wire囉。

ckw3031

amp唔夠力出???
100 w per channel may be enough la
HOHOHO 發表於 2012-3-9 23:27

數字只能作參考，聽聲先係實際。
好多AV amp都有120、150W，咪又係得數字上好力。
冇謂強求行bi wire喎，行返single咪算。

HOHOHO

咁行single就當然冇問題喇，樓主話行bi wire就衰聲、暗晒，咁咪就係唔夠力比bi wire囉。 ...
ckw3031 發表於 2012-3-9 23:30

but I mean even single in "high freq input" first is much poor than single in "low freq input";
may be the  "high freq input" socket has problem?

ckw3031

but I mean even single in "high freq input" first is much poor than single in "low freq input";
ma ...
HOHOHO 發表於 2012-3-9 23:33

咁點解唔交叉駁？

HOHOHO

咁點解唔交叉駁？
ckw3031 發表於 2012-3-9 23:39

you mean single wire but 交叉駁 pattern?
Good idea I will try this today

silvermoon

如果用2萬內合併機, 基本上你用single wire比你bi-wire仲好聲, 好多時部機未必夠力(即維持2組穩定輸出+力水同單獨輸出1組相差唔多先得)

如果唔係就等同兩頭唔到岸, 高音半桶水, 低音半桶水, 0.5?+0.5? =/= 1
倒不如single wire cross pattern插法+靚jumper, 仲開心同埋又洗少d錢

我以前都一直堅持玩bi-wire, 玩左幾年
直至換返single wire, 先知部機唔夠力真係唔好玩bi-wire, 浪費部機之餘又可能令你洗無謂錢