師兄去消費者委員會投訴佢啦.比Ｄ壓力佢,好快有回應啦.
本帖最後由 lcktemp 於 2012-8-22 09:48 編輯
師兄去消費者委員會投訴佢啦.比Ｄ壓力佢,好快有回應啦.
dc2 發表於 2012-8-22 09:26 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
我水貨嚟，無得點樣投訴，佢有權唔收我機，但係我問左佢會整先拎部機上去，點知佢咁玩走我，我諗消費者委員會都無辦法喇！
我之前都講自己買水機應該承受風險，但係JVC呢批機真係本身有內在毛病如鎖機（我試過4至5次）燈泡極速死亡等等，結果要用戶自己埋單加搬搬抬抬！
我水貨嚟，無得點樣投訴，佢有權唔收我機，但係我問左佢會整先拎部機上去，點知佢咁玩走我，我諗消費者委 ...
lcktemp 發表於 2012-8-22 09:33 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
咁就頭痛啦
咁就頭痛啦
dc2 發表於 2012-8-22 09:35 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
MACKCAM琴晚回覆燈泡無得保。 遮係點都死！
## Please do not write below this line ##
Ticket #4895: Repair JVC DLA-RS40
Your request (#4895) has been updated.
To review the status of the request and add additional comments, follow the link below:
http://mackcam.zendesk.com/tickets/4895
You can also add a comment by replying to this email.
Cheryl, Aug 21 12:00 pm (EDT):
Hello Leung,
If the unit is in need of a new bulb, MACK would not be responsible for the cost of the replacement bulb or the service fee. The bulb replacement is not covered under the warranty you have purchased. We offer a separate bulb replacement warranty which allows the customer two bulb replacements within the 3 years. That warranty also does not cover service fees.
Thank you!
MACKCAM琴晚回覆燈泡無得保。 遮係點都死！
## Please do not write below this line ##
Ticket #4895: ...
lcktemp 發表於 2012-8-22 09:45 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
師兄,真係欲哭無淚呀{:6_194:}
本帖最後由 lcktemp 於 2012-8-22 10:53 編輯
師兄,真係欲哭無淚呀
hit87761 發表於 2012-8-22 10:30 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
{:6_203:}4皮幾野，1.5年玩完！ 67千蚊應該可以救番醒佢！(應該搾wo，如果底板有事就更加多錢)但係。。。下次又黎咪PK？ 我睇番AVS好多人咁死，拎左番廠唔知有無換燈泡以外PARTS，話係燈泡引起，咁先慘，睇唔通個值搏率！
請問有無人收壞機?? 收到幾多錢呢??
Please refer to the following :
http://www.avsforum.com/t/1296327/official-jvc-rs40-x3-owners-thread/8730
3/8/12 at 12:39pm
JackB
offline
1,516 Posts. Joined 4/1999
Location: Pauma Valley, CA USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post
Jack- thanks for posting. From Ron Jone's recent discussion with JVC, I'm under the impression we might see another variation soon.
i'd like to see them change the policy from days to hours. IMO, this makes more sense and would give more confidence to the lamp warranty. I use my RS55 as a secondary projector and will only have at most ~100 hours in 90 days.
I believe that it's clear from a lot of the postings lately that JVC has finally figured out that they have a serious problem with these new projectors and that they had better address the matter. IMHO there is only one or two actions that they can take that will fix the issue; Recall all of the projectors for a demonstrable engineered fix that will give the bulbs at least 2,000 hours in eco mode or replace the bulbs at no cost for an extended period of time of at least five years.
Without this fix I could never recommend this projector to anyone. There are too many similarly performing beamers that don't have a problem as significant as this. Having to spend close to $500/year on a new bulb is not what I signed up for. Those who use it more are looking at $1,000/yr. It doesn't make sense for JVC to continue with this exposure.
It will take us at least six more months of reports on this and the use thread before we find out if the -003 bulb modification has solved the problem. We can only hope.
4皮幾野，1.5年玩完！ 67千蚊應該可以救番醒佢！(應該搾wo，如果底板有事就更加多錢)但係。 ...
lcktemp 發表於 2012-8-22 10:41 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
4皮幾野,點解唔係行貨?之前回落到$36000,我已找朋友訂一部X3白色,但見部機非常大部同重,老婆唔鍾意rejected咗,咁啱sony出咗30es才無買jvc{:6_136:}
I have been thinking about upgrading my Sony HW15(no problem so far after 2-3 years use) to a new JVC. Maybe I should think again.
報生果報攪大佢喇。d代理錢就識收/加價，保得頭一年講真洗鬼你保咩。頭一年都壞你個牌子摺得喇
本帖最後由 lcktemp 於 2012-8-22 11:21 編輯
4皮幾野,點解唔係行貨?之前回落到$36000,我已找朋友訂一部X3白色,但見部機非常大部同重,老婆唔鍾意r ...
hit87761 發表於 2012-8-22 10:51 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
我2011年3月買架!眼鏡都自己比錢買咖！
