3) 50% amp 50% speaker
5 好玩啦
好頭...衰尾
衰頭...好尾
兩者都.....{:6_146:}
normally, the ratio between amp and speaker is 70/30.
most of ching are doing this way.
3K speaker with 7k amp
90k speaker with 210k amp
300k speaker with 700k amp
expensive amp is not = high power or current.
all is mix and match and choose according to your taste. it is not a fix formular.
therefore choosethe speakers first to suit your taste and match with the amp!listen and test more then you know!
我而家正正就係(2). 垃圾speaker配8k港紙int amp, 啲聲對我嚟講相當不俗...終於可以發揮到對speaker.
in fact, i am using an energy speakers ($4000) with a cheap DIY tube amp.thinking of whether upgrade the amp or change to another pair of speakers.considering all your comments, i will try changing to a better amp to try to use the most of the speakers first.
in fact, i am using an energy speakers ($4000) with a cheap DIY tube amp.thinking of whether upgra ...
hk_586 發表於 2010-8-28 23:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Agree!! Ching case still not push the speaker to the limit, buy better amp first, and then change the speaker later......{:6_239:}
咩1定2
呢d咁既問題
背後一定仲有一個大原則:就係你有無老細support
無老細1定2有咩所謂買完試完咪當學野law
有老細就完全唔同,老細支持{:6_195:}的話同無老細一樣做法
老細唔支持{:6_201:}就梗係行1方案,真係要換最多換一件amp入紙批都容易d
以聽歌來說, 先買高檔次的 amp or speaker 都冇太大分別. 反正 聽歌唔同 av, 合自己心意的 int amp 和 speaker 其實都可以玩好耐.
相反, 如果是玩 av, 就可以先買 貴 speaker 配 普通 amp先. 因為 av amp 的 life cycle 真係越來越短. 如果一心一意想買過中高檔 av amp 先, 再配 普通 speaker, 但過了幾年後, 好可能都係 av amp 和 speaker 都要一齊換.
係呀, 聽歌d 機, 喇叭鍾意既可以用好耐. 我對ProAc t2000s 都6, 7年了.
由5k int. amp => 5k int. amp + 8k power amp => 20k int. amp 都一直進步中. 我諗對speaker依家應該都去到盡了. 而再進步要有個好d既聆聽既環境了.
我覺得AMP 比SPEAKERS 好是比較重要,如果個speaKers惡過部amp你套機分分鐘有氣無力
以前家父用Classie 推舊dyanaudio,之後執左部Krell KSA-50(定25此記了,總之是最細power那部)
即時唔同晒,雖然Krell D聲粗D但比較有血肉....
