djaddy
發表於 2010-1-12 14:20
其實我之前有試過不過唔得!
而且我要開投射先試到, 又唔想插線去電視。
jasonbiker 發表於 2010-1-12 10:33 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
I understand.
intex
發表於 2010-1-12 16:34
轉述某no台OPPO 83SE (UPGRADE VERSION) 的用家評鑑:
200hrs burn-in time has passed. Let me sum it up.
The SE's 2.CH has better detail that brings low-level spatial cues when comparing with the original 83. The treble has better extension and air. The vocal is warmer, and less fragile. The soundstage is wider and deeper with a better sense of the instruments' locations. Overall, the 2.Ch of the 83SE is 35% better than the original 83.
The M.CH shares the same characteristic of the 2Ch. I used to feel there was something in the soundtrack with the original 83. However, with the SE, this feeling is gone. The SE sounds very clear, and brings out everything detail. It even has better resolution and clarity that my Denon 4802 AV-Amp (It is the U.S. version of the A11SR. Although it is old, it is still a fine sounding AV-Amp). However, the Denon reproduce the surround sound effects better the SE. Overall, the M.Ch of the SE improved 30% of the original 83.
This upgrade not only improves the sound, it also improves the video a little bit. The picture is a little clearer, and has a little better contrast.
The bottom line: I cannot think of any upgrade that improves that much. It is absolutely worth $300USD.
本人十分欣賞兩人對83和83SE(UPGRADE VERSION)細心的分析評鑑!
djaddy
發表於 2010-1-12 18:38
轉述某no台OPPO 83SE (UPGRADE VERSION) 的用家評鑑:
200hrs burn-in time has passed. Let me sum it up.
The SE's 2.CH has better detail that brings low-level spatial cues when comparing with the origina ...
intex 發表於 2010-1-12 16:34 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
I have already read this report in R33 a few days ago. Seems like my EeePC can match / outperform the 83SE. {:6_193:}
cmsjkung
發表於 2010-1-12 20:25
If upgrade to SE not more than HK$ 2500 then I may do it.... but still no news from ouku
djaddy
發表於 2010-1-12 21:48
If upgrade to SE not more than HK$ 2500 then I may do it.... but still no news from ouku
cmsjkung 發表於 2010-1-12 20:25 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
The Oppo 83 SE Nuforce Edition will leave 83 SE for dust!
Extracting high-quality audio from Blu-ray players is problematic. The HDMI signal interleaves video and audio data which, upon decoding, produces an inherent jitter as high as 7nanoseconds (For comparison, a good CD player’s jitter is in the picosecond range). In practical terms, it is difficult to properly decode HDMI audio without employing extensive reclocking circuits, thus pushing up the cost of a good HDMI audio pre-processor.
The simplest way to improve analog audio performance is at the source. The Oppo BDP-83SE player incorporates ESS Technology’s state-of-the-art Sabre DAC, widely acknowledged as one of the industry’s best. The 7.1 multi-channel unit employs a single 8-channel Sabre DAC. The stereo channels’ dedicated Sabre DAC is achieved by stacking four DACs per left and right channel for utmost transparency and dynamic range.
The Nuforce Edition elevates performance yet further by:
* Replacing critical analog components with the high-grade equivalents NuForce uses in its high-end audio components
* Superior high-speed power regulation on both DACs and all analog power rails.Improved power supply regulation also applies to the 7.1 channels
* High-performance parts and related circuits/component values replacing the stereo channels’ monolithic devices.
* Bypass the Stereo and 7.1 channels’ output muting circuits.The SE’s relays are better than the standard BDP-83’s muting transistors. Nevertheless, imposing as little as possible along critical signal paths is clearly preferable.
The result is a better power supply and optimized analog signal paths. As always, the proof is in the listening. The improvements in stereo (CD, SACD, DVD-A, BD Audio), and L/R/C movie outputs are clearly audible.
The standard Oppo BDP-83SE offers exemplary audio performance. The Nuforce Edition goes a step further in transparency, dynamics, and detail retrieval. As is typical of all Nuforce products, these benefits relate directly to our high-end product line in the preservation of musical truth.
chunny98
發表於 2010-1-12 21:52
If upgrade to SE not more than HK$ 2500 then I may do it.... but still no news from ouku
cmsjkung 發表於 2010-1-12 20:25 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
師兄換了相...差d唔認得你{:6_121:}
chunny98
發表於 2010-1-12 21:54
Oppo 83 SE Nuforce Edition 要$11000{:6_168:}
http://www.claritym.com/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage.tpl&product_id=24&category_id=6&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=1&lang=zh&vmcchk=1&Itemid=1
cmsjkung
發表於 2010-1-12 22:18
本帖最後由 cmsjkung 於 2010-1-12 22:21 編輯
師兄換了相...差d唔認得你{:6_121:}
chunny98 發表於 2010-1-12 21:52 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
New year... New look.... {:6_236:}
cmsjkung
發表於 2010-1-12 22:19
The Oppo 83 SE Nuforce Edition will leave 83 SE for dust!
Extracting high-quality audio from Blu-ray players is problematic. The HDMI signal interleaves video and audio data which, upon decoding, p ...
djaddy 發表於 2010-1-12 21:48 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Oppo 83 SE Nuforce Edition may be too expensive for audio improve only..... {:6_192:}
djaddy
發表於 2010-1-13 15:54
Oppo 83 SE Nuforce Edition may be too expensive for audio improve only..... {:6_192:}
cmsjkung 發表於 2010-1-12 22:19 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
I will stick w/ my EeePC or 2 ch. ;)
