Pioneer amp最衰既地方係無得逐隻speaker較分頻點, 無用盡隻speaker
yamaha can't 逐隻較 as well, i set 90 ,because my surround said only reach 78 .(afaird too 抆)will lose some of them .
再唔係整個"THX規格"去試下(即係全部small)
for me its better , the layer more detail .
i listen mk in the show that day , i guess they use at least 100 or 120 cross .....
the disc they try that day(28 weeks later) , the helicopter sound from woofer , not from front , it really depends which way u like , please tell me the result when u try it.
Pioneer amp最衰既地方係無得逐隻speaker較分頻點, 無用盡隻speaker
yamaha can't 逐隻較 as well, i set 90 ,because my surround said only reach 78 .(afaird too 抆)will lose some of them .
再唔係整個"THX ...
claero 發表於 2009-8-10 21:35 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
嗯, 我會再分享的....
唔好笑小弟新手Report就得啦~{:6_179:}
嗯, 我會再分享的....
唔好笑小弟新手Report就得啦~{:6_179:}
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-10 21:59 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
cake兄講笑咩，你ＤReport 毒害萬千網民， 仲點算新手呀！{:6_174:}
cake兄講笑咩，你ＤReport 毒害萬千網民， 仲點算新手呀！{:6_174:}
maner394 發表於 2009-8-10 22:04 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Maner兄誇獎了...{:6_162:}
只要各師兄"奶"毒"奶"得happy...
毒死都死得甘心就得啦.....{:6_176:}
Maner兄誇獎了...{:6_162:}
只要各師兄"奶"毒"奶"得happy...
毒死都死得甘心就得啦.....{:6_176:}
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-10 22:17 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
一Ｄ都唔誇，當日先鋒 5.1耳筒個份 report，真係死傷無數，繼而再黎 MA 喇叭，連我細佬同線王都係死在你手上{:6_174:}
一Ｄ都唔誇，當日先鋒 5.1耳筒個份 report，真係死傷無數，繼而再黎 MA 喇叭，連我細佬同線王都係死在你手上{:6_174:}
maner394 發表於 2009-8-10 22:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Maner兄真係太誇獎了, 小弟受之有愧..{:6_162:}
不過隻Pioneer SE-DRS3000C 5.1耳筒 , 我都知真係毒死左好多人...{:6_127:}
其實不論Pioneer AV amp, Pioneer 5.1耳筒, 甚至係MA speaker都好...
係佢本身真係有料到, 效果係得...
如果本身質數真係唔ok的話, 小弟點樣講都無用呢....
Maner兄真係太誇獎了, 小弟受之有愧..{:6_162:}
不過隻Pioneer SE-DRS3000C 5.1耳筒 , 我都知真係毒死左好多人...{:6_127:}
其實不論Pioneer AV amp, Pioneer 5.1耳筒, 甚至係MA speaker都好...
係佢本身真係有 ...
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-10 22:57 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
講得啱......最緊要件產品得，唔係送比你都無用！
咁睇pioneer and yamaha 既bass management 就"媽夫"少少. Onkyo 都可以遂隻set. 你一係用全set同model speakers, 吾係就要就前面LCR. pioneer and yamaha 高階D amp會吾會好D? Sony 9000es bass management and E ...
ryanenen 發表於 2009-8-11 10:14 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Pioneer amp既MCACC係勁...不過連咁基本既野都無真係那個左少少.....
Sony amp....唉....我都想換STR-DA5400ES.......
經過一星期後再較機...
分別用左以下幾個方法較:
1.) Front: Large, Center: Small, Surround:Small, Sub: Plus, xOver:50
2.)Front: Large, Center: Small, Surround:Small, Sub: Plus, xOver:80
3.)Front: Small, Center: Small, Surround:Small, Sub: Yes
4.)Front: Large, Center: Large, Surround:Small, Sub: Plus, xOver:80
第1.個方法: 50Hz做crossover(前置最低週為45Hz +/- 3db), 所以超高分析力, 不過低音就...............(crossover太抆了..)
第2.3.4.個方法: 其實效果相似...但淸析度, 不論高音和低音, 方法4.為最好
淸析度排序以下4.>2.>3.
"THX規格"(全small)低音係好, 但高中音就濛D...
4.就因為中置set "Large", 多番幾10 h聽下, 中置既聲出番D...
唔....試多次方法1.較多次先.....用EQ推爆佢60Hz.....
經過一星期後再較機...
分別用左以下幾個方法較:
1.) Front: Large, Center: Small, Surround:Small, Sub: Plus, xOver:50
2.)Front: Large, Center: Small, Surround:Small, Sub: Plus, xOver:80
3.)Front: Small ...
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-16 09:06 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
較 EQ 對我黎講太高階了{:6_137:}, 我都想學{:6_139:}
