cakecake
發表於 2009-8-9 21:32
真係越調越正{:6_134:}
chhanthony 發表於 2009-8-9 19:32 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
話就話聲底和Monitor Audio差不多...
但EQ既較法完全不同...想死...{:6_206:}
衣加重未較得滿意...等佢地Run多一排正式Run in先再較....
aibo99
發表於 2009-8-9 21:50
我元朗買的
有Classic Three做Demo
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-9 21:27 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
請問元朗邊間鋪 ?
Thanks
leung0709
發表於 2009-8-9 21:59
呢兩日再較部機....
發覺三隻NHT越來越AV向......{:6_128:}
都唔知好定唔好....{:6_143:}
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-9 18:44 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
cake兄係時候影音分家啦...{:6_222:}
aibo99
發表於 2009-8-10 11:01
我元朗買的
有Classic Three做Demo
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-9 21:27 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
cakecake師兄,請問你在元朗哪間鋪買 ?
qq1122yq
發表於 2009-8-10 11:53
恆香對面現代 {:1_330:}
claero
發表於 2009-8-10 14:06
Monitor Audio RS系列o係AV & Music兩用既話算係有好好表現了{:6_193:}
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-9 20:32 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
i think its really hard to find soemthing that can perform good for both .... even the rs series , the punch was not enough .i have st4 before , the punch was very strong. you are comapre the bookshelf ,try the floorstand and you can tell.
claero
發表於 2009-8-10 14:13
話就話聲底和Monitor Audio差不多...
但EQ既較法完全不同...想死...{:6_206:}
衣加重未較得滿意...等佢地Run多一排正式Run in先再較....
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-9 21:32 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
i tune the high to the top (+6), because its a little backward , and i add the bass as well . i set the cross at 90 , so that i get the punch right to my face instead of woofer , i think this is a better way because nht can handle the low . i think if u set the high more , u can improve total for cd or concert , i won't say can win england speaker but not that far as you said
cakecake
發表於 2009-8-10 20:07
i think its really hard to find soemthing that can perform good for both .... even the rs series , the punch was not enough .i have st4 before , the punch was very strong. you are comapre the books ...
claero 發表於 2009-8-10 14:06 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
MA RS既座地(RS6 & RS8), 絕對係好夠爆的(家父用緊RS6..)
當然論爆既程度一定唔及Nht座地
cakecake
發表於 2009-8-10 20:17
本帖最後由 cakecake 於 2009-8-10 20:32 編輯
i tune the high to the top (+6), because its a little backward , and i add the bass as well . i set the cross at 90 , so that i get the punch right to my face instead of woofer , i think this is a b ...
claero 發表於 2009-8-10 14:13 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
其實分頻我set 左做80hz,
有D抆..
其實前置(Classic Three)可以去到60幾, 但因為隻Nht Classic Two C最低週係 78hz +/- 3db, 變左就埋隻中置...不過set 做80hz都係抆....
(Pioneer amp最衰既地方係無得逐隻speaker較分頻點, 無用盡隻speaker...)
尼緊星期日有空再較較....試下將分頻set 做100hz睇下點...
再唔係整個"THX規格"去試下(即係全部small)
EQ部份和Pioneer LX50既性格配合, 經過兩日既調較已經知道Nht既較法了, 所以下次較機會快番D..
鐵心心
發表於 2009-8-10 20:27
Pioneer amp最衰係無得逐隻speaker較分頻點 ...
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-10 20:17 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
真係好鬼衰.....