cakecake 發表於 2009-8-9 21:32

真係越調越正{:6_134:}
chhanthony 發表於 2009-8-9 19:32 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
話就話聲底和Monitor Audio差不多...
但EQ既較法完全不同...想死...{:6_206:}
衣加重未較得滿意...等佢地Run多一排正式Run in先再較....

aibo99 發表於 2009-8-9 21:50


我元朗買的
有Classic Three做Demo
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-9 21:27 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

請問元朗邊間鋪 ?

Thanks

leung0709 發表於 2009-8-9 21:59

呢兩日再較部機....
發覺三隻NHT越來越AV向......{:6_128:}
都唔知好定唔好....{:6_143:}
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-9 18:44 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
cake兄係時候影音分家啦...{:6_222:}

aibo99 發表於 2009-8-10 11:01


我元朗買的
有Classic Three做Demo
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-9 21:27 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

cakecake師兄,請問你在元朗哪間鋪買 ?

qq1122yq 發表於 2009-8-10 11:53

恆香對面現代   {:1_330:}

claero 發表於 2009-8-10 14:06


Monitor Audio RS系列o係AV & Music兩用既話算係有好好表現了{:6_193:}
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-9 20:32 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif


i think its really hard to find soemthing that can perform good for both .... even the rs series , the punch was not enough .i have st4 before , the punch was very strong. you are comapre the bookshelf ,try the floorstand and you can tell.

claero 發表於 2009-8-10 14:13


話就話聲底和Monitor Audio差不多...
但EQ既較法完全不同...想死...{:6_206:}
衣加重未較得滿意...等佢地Run多一排正式Run in先再較....
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-9 21:32 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

i tune the high to the top (+6), because its a little backward , and i add the bass as well . i set the cross at 90 , so that i get the punch right to my face instead of woofer , i think this is a better way because nht can handle the low . i think if u set the high more , u can improve total for cd or concert , i won't say can win england speaker but not that far as you said

cakecake 發表於 2009-8-10 20:07




i think its really hard to find soemthing that can perform good for both .... even the rs series , the punch was not enough .i have st4 before , the punch was very strong. you are comapre the books ...
claero 發表於 2009-8-10 14:06 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
MA RS既座地(RS6 & RS8), 絕對係好夠爆的(家父用緊RS6..)
當然論爆既程度一定唔及Nht座地

cakecake 發表於 2009-8-10 20:17

本帖最後由 cakecake 於 2009-8-10 20:32 編輯



i tune the high to the top (+6), because its a little backward , and i add the bass as well . i set the cross at 90 , so that i get the punch right to my face instead of woofer , i think this is a b ...
claero 發表於 2009-8-10 14:13 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
其實分頻我set 左做80hz,
有D抆..
其實前置(Classic Three)可以去到60幾, 但因為隻Nht Classic Two C最低週係 78hz +/- 3db, 變左就埋隻中置...不過set 做80hz都係抆....
(Pioneer amp最衰既地方係無得逐隻speaker較分頻點, 無用盡隻speaker...)
尼緊星期日有空再較較....試下將分頻set 做100hz睇下點...
再唔係整個"THX規格"去試下(即係全部small)

EQ部份和Pioneer LX50既性格配合, 經過兩日既調較已經知道Nht既較法了, 所以下次較機會快番D..

鐵心心 發表於 2009-8-10 20:27


Pioneer amp最衰係無得逐隻speaker較分頻點 ...
cakecake 發表於 2009-8-10 20:17 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
真係好鬼衰.....
頁: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9
查看完整版本: Nht Classic Three & Classic Two C 的100個鐘後...

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。