andprise
發表於 2012-10-24 10:08
百目 發表於 2012-10-22 14:11 static/image/common/back.gif
唉師兄...還是一持己見...
1,過左保養,人地唔保好正常
2,你想維修,正常,但都要可以維修先得... ...
如果你真係FAD用家的話都知道,佢地D手工可以話無得攪(同打爛花瓶一樣,叫佢地用AA膠咩)
你又叫人點"維修"呀?
你想維修,正常,但都要可以維修先得...
Lets be fair, in accord to what ching had written above, being a customer, we do not have knowledage in how the product is designed and how to repair when first purchased of the product. We do not even know the product is unrepairable either.
In the matter of fact, this is the obligation of the sole agent to ask and deal with the "Manufacturer" in related to the "Repairing" of the product before lunching the product to the market. If they knew that the product is not able to repair, they should ask the "Manufacturer" to provide "back-up" plan in the case there is a kind of problem like this.
In addition, if the sole agent already acknowledged that the product is not able to repair once there is anything wrong and without warning their customer by all means. They owed a duty of care in related to "Duty of Disclosure" to their customer not to make the declaration either.
Please kindly be understand we are not demanding the sole agent for any "settlement plan". We just want to speak out the turth of what we have encountered.
andprise
發表於 2012-10-24 10:10
ahnel 發表於 2012-10-22 18:15 static/image/common/back.gif
其實拗落去都冇意思, 總之就多謝andprise版友分享左個真實故事比大家聽~
andprise兄又冇謂去convi ...
Ching, thanks for your fair statement.
CLP
發表於 2012-10-24 14:03
不妨一看
絕無影射成份