本帖最後由 maner394 於 2009-4-30 23:59 編輯
c兄小心小心呀,.....{:6_192:}
粟米湯 發表於 2009-4-30 23:34 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif其實我以前做過電工，一般基本電器我都懂維修，不過味見過轉壓 fuse box
放心喇，依家換 sunfire fuse 係我强項{:6_183:}
換左有無分別先? {:1_332:}
alzard 發表於 2009-4-30 23:21 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif初步試聽低頻即刻扎實咗，有層次比以往更有力！
$120低玩{:6_193:}
其實我以前做過電工，一般基本電器我都懂維修，不過味見過轉壓 fuse box
放心喇，依家換 sunfire fuse 係我强項{:6_183:}
maner394 發表於 2009-4-30 23:54 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
maner兄,
>2. If the user / client change any parts of the product ( including fuses ) by himself , we will reject any requirement for repair services, or charge him all the cost of parts and service fees base on difference case/ conditions.
以上保養絛文聲稱"用户自己換fuse也會失去保養"
如這次換fuse後又引起問題, 代理也可能引用這絛文而拒絕保養,
所以小心, 小心.
小心!
>2. If the user / client change any parts of the product ( including fuses ) by himself , we will reject any requirement for repair services, or charge him all the cost of parts and service fe ...
ikkjr 發表於 2009-4-30 23:31 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif2. If the user / client change any parts of the product ( including fuses ) by himself , we will reject any requirement for repair services, or charge him all the cost of parts and service fe ...
如果係咁大家最好連電源線都唔好換，用跟機線算喇！
初步試聽低頻即刻扎實咗，有層次比以往更有力！
$120低玩{:6_193:}
maner394 發表於 2009-5-1 00:03 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
真係咁勁! {:1_343:}
等我嘆埋套U571先﹐覺得唔夠先再玩。SVS壞fuse可以自己換﹐唔會無保養。{:1_253:}
之前以經用過240v插入好幾次，但都燒fuse，之後才試用110v個邊插入都一樣，所以才叫mankoo兄影相給我，怎樣插入才正確，恕我見識不多，我覺得sub設計都有問題，fuse箱說明不足，週邊沒有警告字眼，說明書裏沒有fuse ...
maner394 發表於 2009-4-30 23:52 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
師兄, 唔同既意見你或者未必聽得入耳. 個fuse box複習係一個design問題. 你可以投訴去總公司個design唔得. 人地代理做maintenance, 開棺驗屍, 見到人為導致個subwoofer壞, 要收錢都好正常. 雖然保用證寫misuse好含糊, 但以師兄個case, 佢地真係可以話係人為導致損壞.
本帖最後由 alzard 於 2009-5-1 00:17 編輯
2. If the user / client change any parts of the product ( including fuses ) by himself , we will reject any requirement for repair services, or charge him all the cost of parts and service fe ...
如果 ...
maner394 發表於 2009-5-1 00:09 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
就睇下佢夠唔夠膽出封official letter﹐佢敢出就放上forum通知其他Sunfire用戶。
師兄, 唔同既意見你或者未必聽得入耳. 個fuse box複習係一個design問題. 你可以投訴去總公司個design唔得. 人地代理做maintenance, 開棺驗屍, 見到人為導致個subwoofer壞, 要收錢都好正常. 雖然保用證寫misuse好含 ...
radhk 發表於 2009-5-1 00:12 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
你講得無錯﹐個重點係Sunfire manual無寫清楚而導致出錯﹐那負責的理論上唔係用家/代理而係間廠本身。假如真係唔俾用家換fuse﹐咁不如貼張label封死個fuse box咁就可以減少呢D情況出現。
本帖最後由 radhk 於 2009-5-1 00:31 編輯
你講得無錯﹐個重點係Sunfire manual無寫清楚而導致出錯﹐那負責的理論上唔係用家/代理而係間廠本身。假如真係唔俾用家換fuse﹐咁不如貼張label封死個fuse box咁就可以減少呢D情況出現。 ...
alzard 發表於 2009-5-1 00:16 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
你講得0岩, 個錯係廠到. 正確既途徑係你去投訴廠個design, 如果廠認錯, 佢會同代理拆掂, 叫代理免費同你整. 而唔係由你單方面去壓個代理. 代理都要比錢買spare part, 如果因為人為損壞都整, 咁維修比率會比正常高. 即係代理要比更多錢做maintenance.
不過, 我怕廠到時可能話, 美國d fuse box都係咁design, 如果唔識就唔好亂搞. 唔同人有唔同level既知識. 好似換燈, 一個完全咩都唔識既人去換, 電死0左, 怪得邊個.
你講得無錯﹐個重點係Sunfire manual無寫清楚而導致出錯﹐那負責的理論上唔係用家/代理而係間廠本身。假如真係唔俾用家換fuse﹐咁不如貼張label封死個fuse box咁就可以減少呢D情況出現。 ...
alzard 發表於 2009-5-1 00:16 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
你講得無錯X2{:6_164:}
