|
|
真人真事 22L VS 22L2
http://www.av-forums.net/plus/vi ... p;extra=&page=1
DAY 1....
前天失手了....
買了QUAD 22L + Audiolab..
由本來的LG $3000貨仔搞到...唉
CHING 們, 本人是這裡新手, 想與大家分享一下早兩天小弟的STORY.
因本人搬到現在的住址約半年, 但因為不長住, 所以一直都不願投資買好東西.
現在用的是申請NOW時送的THOMSON DVD + CD + MP3 + USB + WMA + 2 個4"中音當全音的喇叭.......的機仔.
心想平時都系比個仔看看"米奇老鼠", 都無所謂啦....以前我多數在大陸工作, 所以好東西都放在大陸的家...
那裡放了 我心愛的$6000大洋 QUAD 12L 一對(我覺得是超值呀), MF Int AMP A5, NAD CDP (忘記了型號了約$4800啦, 因為我呢世及下世都唔會再買NAD的野. 如果有人要HKD1500成交, 我只聽了30次以內), 天龍的AV AMP.....等等.
所以都無唸住買D乜放在HK的家, 但因為買左部PS3, 就唸下是但買部有齊以上 DVD + CD + MP3 + Optical IN.......功能的5.1 DVDP W/ 5件發聲喇叭就算啦. 點知行晒各大"凶宅", "八佬會" 都系接受唔到D機仔既聲...稍為覺得好D的就是LG的5.1 DVDP....可惜連我老婆都問我部LG機仔...."點解D人唱歌唱到"支""支"聲既??"....連我呢個失聰既老婆都甘問我, 你話當時我的心情是如何呢? 最後就去了"有情"......接著就用了1.5小時試聽, 11L2, 12L2, 21L2, 22L, 22L2, FOCAL, TANNOY.....等等...又試了 ACCUPHASE, ONIX, CARY膽 AMP......最後就留下 22L 和 22L2 了..........當然還有AMP, CDP 啦....但明天因仔仔開學, 所以要覺覺豬啦,,,,,如果各CHING 有興趣看的話...小弟明天繼續寫啦...謝謝啊.
DAY 2
哇.....多謝各方打俠支持呀!!
我今天終於收晒所有貨啦, 而剛剛才SETUP 完D機機, 同時我個仔都比我SETUP 左..........
剛才也開始聽歌啦.......吾......聲音如何就後面再說吧......我拍了一些照片, 等明天"偷懶"的時候在UPLOAD.
講回22L 和 22L2, 當時我一直用22L去聽聲及試AMP, 然後我突然問個SALES, 有無22L2系道?? 他說有, 也煲開左! 那我就拿來聽聽啦, 當時試機用的是ONIX 2X MONO AMP, 同埋 ONIX CDP............開聲啦......30秒後我就叫他收聲啦.....吾知系吾系個SALES想"昆"我買22L, 所以就說22L是沒煲的....但如果是真的話, 那真系吾知他用乜去煲22L2啦.......可能煲"窿"左....好明顯那對喇叭"窿"左....應該在22L出現的"場""寬""高"都吾見左, 音場宿左, 人聲"凹"左, 高音........就是多了一些底音....所以我說過他這樣改了22L2的第二中音單元的防塵帽(由子彈頭改為平盤), 是刻意要增加底音....但6"的單元系"低極有限".....但400 - 900HZ就很好啦, 所以為何12L, 22L的人聲比較出, 就是他這個6"盤做得好....可是這樣一改, (吾知分音有無改) 就把原來的優良配置改差了...(我覺得他沒改分音去就,或者ENHANCE) 所以同一的SIGNAL入左分音器去了不同的單元, 那就變的有點不匹配啦. 不過這只是我的個人見解....大家可以去聽聽, 看是否有同樣感覺.
其實在聽22L前, 我就聽了11L2, 但當一聽22L時我發覺我的腳的位置多了一"浸"聲, 這是在11L2聽不到的. 很明顯22L的分析力大大提高了.
其實22L2也是一對很不錯的喇叭, 但跟22L比的話性價比就有所不及啦.........下面有一段文章是從老外的WEB找來的說22L2...大家看看呀.
Quote start"Summary:
This is a review of the Quad 22L2, the second generation of the Quad 22L,which I was extremely lucky (in hindsight) to purchase used for the price I got them at. Prior to purchasing, I was unfamiliar with the speaker and only scarcely familiar with the company, a leading British audio manufacturer. I was looking for something to replace my beloved Klipsch Heresies, and I chose these based on some stellar reviews.
Out of the box, the Quads worried me a little. They were clear and somewhat engaging, but they lacked the easy dynamism of the Heresies and seemed to require a lot of power. Furthermore, they sounded a little boomy in my 25' square listening area. I soon learned, however, that though listed as used, these Quads were not broken in yet. They were essentially brand new. After five hours, I noticed some surprising changes in the sound; little details in the music I hadn't noticed before were starting to come through. And the boomines was subsiding. After 20 hours (right now) they are bordering on unbelievable. They are now as dynamic as my Heresies, but far, far more transparent ("holographic" is appropriate), and without any of the boxy coloration that the Heresies give the music. Before break in, the mid-range on these speakers was recessed, but it is blooming now, and holy man! I've never heard speakers like this before. I've never even auditioned speakers this good, not even the Viennas I listened to at Magnolias were this viscerally exciting. I have them bi-ampilified with Adcom 535 and 545 amps. They like the power, but they could certainly get by with less. I am following the manufacturer's recommendation by positioning them exactly 350 millimeters from the wall. The boominess is completely gone now, and the base is deep and tight. I still use a Def Tech subwoofer, but I have the crossover set almost as low as it goes.
Strengths:
Extremely revealing with big, spacious sound stage ("holographic") and as engaging and dynamic as horn-loaded Heresies. Neutral and uncolored (unlike Heresies). Though detailed, not the least bit clinical or "dry" and suitable for solid state amps (unlike Heresies). Capable of playing loud (like Heresies). Fairly small footprint. Gorgeous with deep gloss piano finish!
Weaknesses:
Reports indicate these speakers must break in for at least 75 hours and perhaps for as long as 200 hours. I can so far testify to the dramatic changes that occur during the first 20 hours.
Similar Products Used:
Mission 761s, Paradigm Phantoms, Boston Acoustic VRM60s, Acoustic Research P428PSs, Klipsh Heresies."Quote End, from Audioreview.com
最後拍板22L一對, 多謝$91XX.呀..系個SALES同我講.......當然有SPK, 就要買AMP啦..我後來試了ACCUPHASE, CARY, YAMAHA, PS, MF X-T100(我忘了MODEL啦, 大約是甘上下啦.), MF A5.5, TAGENT, AUDIOLAB 8000SE. 8000Q + 8000P....而在我試AMP時我突然對我剛買的22L感到有一點忐忑..點解??...因為我聽了一對PMC 嘍....唉....後話啦.........今次我用了6粒鐘先試得晒......而且無法用回22L去試這些機.....我相信這是很多CHING都遇到的問題, 想買機, 但又擔心跟自己的機不配, 但又沒地方可以試齊....所以 "I 突然 have a dream"......., 如果可以有一個地方可以一次過有晒大部分市場上的機種, 可讓客人找出所有(大部分)的配搭, 那我相信一定很多人去...就算為了要減低成本而搬到一些闢一點的地方, 我想都有很多人去.....唉...幾時先會有呢??.........leeping la........TTUGT.. |
|
[複製鏈接]
發表於 2011-4-24 13:17
)
只能用小的…
努力搵錢買屋先
