設為首頁fbYouTubeWhatsapp頻道IG

Post76.hk

搜索
樓主: hk_586

[討論] speaker or amplifier is more important??

  [複製鏈接]

181

主題

6556

回帖

10

精華

鉑金玩家

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10

積分
121920

76 榮譽忠義勲章76 榮譽VIP勲章76 精選榮譽會員勲章76-FC 藍寶石勲章

發表於 2010-8-25 20:50 | 顯示全部樓層
2一定好過1

13

主題

186

回帖

0

精華

進階玩家

Rank: 4

積分
2029
 樓主| 發表於 2010-8-26 00:17 | 顯示全部樓層
my friend is using Foucs Audio FS-78 ($10k) and Cayin A88T ($3.3k).  he bought both 2nd hand (case 1).

i can say the sound is surprising good.  do u know someone is using case (2)?  can we share the experience?

13

主題

186

回帖

0

精華

進階玩家

Rank: 4

積分
2029
 樓主| 發表於 2010-8-26 00:21 | 顯示全部樓層
btw, my friend was using LINN pre (??) + LK140 power amp ($10k+) before.  but i will say the sound of Cayin A88T is matching the FS-78 better.

9

主題

620

回帖

0

精華

專業玩家

Rank: 6Rank: 6

積分
6706
發表於 2010-8-26 10:28 | 顯示全部樓層
i tried to use 200k combo(cd, pre+power, cables) to push 5K bookshelf speakers.
i can say that i pushed the speaker to the limit no matter on power side also high Frequency, low frequency and mid range. i never hear that speakers in this good sound. however the damping and power too high for that speakers, sound bit too tight!

9

主題

620

回帖

0

精華

專業玩家

Rank: 6Rank: 6

積分
6706
發表於 2010-8-26 10:29 | 顯示全部樓層
msot of ching does not explore the limit of the speakers. it is waste!

9

主題

620

回帖

0

精華

專業玩家

Rank: 6Rank: 6

積分
6706
發表於 2010-8-26 10:30 | 顯示全部樓層
therefore some ching using over 200k gear to push Dyna C1. but some ching using 20k gear to push C1. it is your choice!

111

主題

2450

回帖

0

精華

鑽石玩家

Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12

積分
321711

76 榮譽VIP勲章76 精選榮譽會員勲章76-FC 藍寶石勲章

發表於 2010-8-26 10:40 | 顯示全部樓層
2

13

主題

186

回帖

0

精華

進階玩家

Rank: 4

積分
2029
 樓主| 發表於 2010-8-26 11:48 | 顯示全部樓層
i see.  amplifier plays a more important role than speaker in a set.

14

主題

426

回帖

0

精華

高級玩家

Rank: 5Rank: 5

積分
4470
發表於 2010-8-27 00:33 | 顯示全部樓層
i see.  amplifier plays a more important role than speaker in a set.
hk_586 發表於 2010-8-26 11:48

C Hing, don't draw final conclusion too soon.

According to the examples given by two c hings, we cannot say (1) is better than (2) or vice versa.
On the other hand, this is a very good topic which deserves much discussion.

I don't think there'll be a definite result. however, it semms to me that it is easier to find a better combination of (1) than (2) in the market. Here is my thought, correct me if I were wrong:
If you have very good speakers, very easy to push, i.e. regenerate the original sound with a smaller current, then the current and power provided by the amp is small and a cheap amp can do the job.
Secondly, if you have very poor speakers, i.e. cannot regenate the original sound even with a large current, then the high power and large current provided by the expensive amp is just a waste. In the worst senario, this combination can only produce loud noise!
新手入門

2

主題

96

回帖

0

精華

進階玩家

Rank: 4

積分
2113
發表於 2010-8-27 00:36 | 顯示全部樓層
(2) 好過 (1), 起碼升級喇叭方便D , 又可試唔同喇叭級數分別
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 成為會員

本版積分規則  允許回帖郵件提醒樓主

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表