QUAD 12L2 vs Focal JMLAB 806/807v

pittpitt123

focal 啦， 上次上阿二到試野爆過807v ，同806v真的很大分別

babuwa

回復  babuwa
I have tried 806 VS 807. 807 is better a lot than 806. Same comment as you.
randyma 發表於 2010-8-20 10:42

What amp Ching using now? even 807V esay to push (92dB), but I found it's require high current amp to show it's potential.

randyma

I am now using Yamaha 665 with Marantz mm8003.

babuwa

I am now using Yamaha 665 with Marantz mm8003.
randyma 發表於 2010-8-20 10:58

    Really good, marantz amp is one of the good match with Focal. that should be great.

goro

回復 22# babuwa
我都見其他ching有講過focal係越推越有,睇黎要搵隻power amp餵下佢

goro

回復 24# babuwa
係,但係可能自己用緊low end馬仔,硬係覺包圍同定位差d,會唔會hi end model會好D?

randyma

回復  babuwa
係,但係可能自己用緊low end馬仔,硬係覺包圍同定位差d,會唔會hi end model會好D? ...
goro 發表於 2010-8-20 12:55

Of course. Higher price with better performance la.

98741236

Quad12L2....濛??????

cchhll01

仲有一點係focal易推同埋夠唔夠力推既理論,我從另一位高人學了一套

所謂夠力,唔係代表大聲,部部amp都可以曹到拆天

夠力既定義係幾大聲都好,也能保持應有的細緻度,才叫夠力(當然大家可以同我位朋友既睇法唔同)

要定義何為夠力方法上,最簡單就是大聲得來又不覺炒耳,咁就ok

而focal本身就是一隻較尖的喇叭,如果開大聲少少而拆耳或失真,就已經唔係代表易推的了,只是本身聲音取向錯覺~

pittpitt123

而focal本身就是一隻較尖的喇叭,如果開大聲少少而拆耳或失真,就已經唔係代表易推的了,只是本身聲音取向錯覺~

唔駛拆聲，我用 marantz 6004 av amp 直出唔駛大聲己經好失望.... 夠力水既av amp 好緊要，如果唔係的話要加power amp ，靚既 av amp + power amp .... 天與地