|
|
本帖最後由 claero 於 2010-3-10 01:18 編輯
小弟所用的AV pre只是886, (實在懷疑5507和886音質分別有幾大) 論音質, 以兩聲道為準則的話, 886真的只是一部一般以下的貨色
886 and 5507 not that big different , dynamic will be a little better and the bass a little more tight as well , but sound quality was just the same or i can't hear the different .
鬼佬機雖好, 但是除Bug過程絕非佬機般先進, 再加上價錢貴, 但壽命短, 至今我都認為不宜投資超過二萬 ......
鬼佬機 was really expensive ....like krell or lexicon ,most of them over 4xxxx,but cary 's price was fair enough as half ,i guess every one will have power amp since they will consider 5507 or cary ,so around 8xxx more for sound quality , for me i think it worth,i 've been thinking of 5507 ,886 or even pioneer 90 or z11 before (i used yamaha 3800 with power amp), but after i heard cary ,i drop my idea right away ,and if we disccuss about 多功能, honestly most of them i never use myself, like sound effect ,surround mode , or upscaling , bd player can do upscaling now a day ,so i rather go directly to projector or tv (no need to worry about data loss if av amp 's video part not good enough),and also if the density of sound was good enough , surround mode and effect was no use since i only want want to listen the ORIGINAL sound ,direct sound form source .
this is what i wanna say , i m not saying 5507 was not good . its a very successful multifunction model in between.
for example ,if i have limit buget for 5507(16xxx) and parasound a52 (13xxx), i rather choose cary 11a with a cheaper power amp like 1075 (6xxx),so my end up price will be almost the same,i 've been experience that the "head" (i mean pre-amp)was more important than power amp . i mean the "head" not magnify good enough so that the power amp can't fully work 100% ,this is all my own experience that i wanna share . no offence  |
評分
-
查看全部評分
|
[複製鏈接]
發表於 2010-3-9 12:04
