Sony 65" 要A1 定等A8F 好？

kongtat

小小Pat 發表於 2018-5-23 18:19
你啱，個人覺得無論邊部都係上牆比較好，除非家居環環晤容許，我想表達係A1一定上牆，但A8個坐台設計唔係 ...

當然！上牆最好，如果可以上牆，已經買咗A1 了！
新世界個show睇A8 應該係直立的，就算是斜，也應該沒有A1 咁斜！

小小Pat

kongtat 發表於 2018-5-23 18:29
當然！上牆最好，如果可以上牆，已經買咗A1 了！
新世界個show睇A8 應該係直立的，就算是斜，也應該沒有A ...

冇a1咁斜， 但整體都係斜嘅設計，我唔知道可唔可以 將佢拉番直 90度角，估計應該唔得！ 或者考慮下第三方 出嘅㗎例如 國內有啲座地電視架！

henrywmh

頭先上左showroom 望下A8F 既實物，感覺係無A1  咁高科技感，但女人又覺得A1 後面個支架好大舊好影響個擺位
另外因為位置關係唔會用5.1 speaker,諗住買soundbar,我見SONY St-5000 好似都幾好，但其實都幾大舊會有少少阻到個畫面，有無方法可以整高少少部電視又唔會影響個soundbar 出聱效果呢？

nighos

畫質上其實有咩分別？
如果唔差得遠都係A8F好d
掛牆夠貼差好遠，本身個廳唔大

wklie

nighos 發表於 2018-5-24 00:46
畫質上其實有咩分別？
如果唔差得遠都係A8F好d
掛牆夠貼差好遠，本身個廳唔大 ...

https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/sony/a8f

https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/sony/a1e-oled

nighos

wklie 發表於 2018-5-24 09:43
https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/sony/a8f

https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/sony/a1e-oled

thanks

https://www.rtings.com/tv/tools/ ... y-a1e/603/434#usage*4854!threshold*0.01

咁睇A8F仲高分過A1

Even though the two models share the same OLED panel type and video processor the A8F has better SDR sustained brightness which boosts it’s score by 0.06 in 'Movies' and better Pre calibration and stutter performance that add another 0.02 for a total of 0.09 that rounds up to 0.1.
Something similar holds true for the TV Shows. A8F gets a boost from better SDR Peak brightness of 0.06 which is not offset by the slight worse viewing angle where it loses only 0.03. However, this 0.03 net gain is enough to round it up to to 8.5 vs the 8.4 of the A1E.
These differences though, should not be a decisive factor as they are minimal and also they fall into the variability of the Panels due to manufacturing tolerances.

Watergold

A1最有型X2

kongtat

哩度話A1 好過A8!
https://www.whathifi.com/sony/kd-65af8/review

AskaLung@FB

kongtat 發表於 2018-5-25 09:20
哩度話A1 好過A8!
https://www.whathifi.com/sony/kd-65af8/review

咁奇怪！竟然冇X-tended Dynamic Range

wklie

kongtat 發表於 2018-5-25 09:20
哩度話A1 好過A8!
https://www.whathifi.com/sony/kd-65af8/review

It uses "dynamic contrast mode and Live Colour" for evaluation.  This is wrong.  Its picture evaluation cannot be trusted.