Boxing Day 加版 4K UHD 些小收穫

SonSon · 發表於 2016-12-29 12:10

Vigilante 發表於 2016-12-29 10:57
It's really hard to say because the film wasn't originally shot in 4K. Remastering it won't help t ...

35mm 菲林解像度已有4k質素..............

[youtube]VXNHNqcceuY[/youtube]

Vigilante · 發表於 2016-12-29 12:37

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

jc2ssych · 發表於 2016-12-29 19:58

本帖最後由 jc2ssych 於 2016-12-29 20:03 編輯

35mm film原生超越4k是肯定的（好似係近8k）。

但話分兩頭，Nolan所有作品嘅IMAX篇幅，只佔片長不到10%；而 Dark Knight trilogy 故事整體都係夜景，無論地面或地下。換句話說，家庭影碟的4K，要處理埋在暗黑場景的 non-IMAX filming 的 undesirable 雜訊，是有難度的。睇 BD 1080 都可能唔太覺，但4k要做到全片全滑淨畫面，頗花功夫！

onon4359 · 發表於 2016-12-29 23:48

本帖最後由 onon4359 於 2016-12-29 23:50 編輯

jc2ssych 發表於 2016-12-29 19:58
35mm film原生超越4k是肯定的（好似係近8k）。

但話分兩頭，Nolan所有作品嘅IMAX篇幅，只佔片長不到10%； ...

黑夜之神都有30分鐘,星際啟示錄就成粒幾鐘!

jc2ssych · 發表於 2016-12-30 09:38

樓上師兄正確。

更正：IMAX footage length

The Dark Knight - almost 20 mins

The Dark Knight Rises - 72 mins

Interstellar - over an hour

SonSon · 發表於 2016-12-30 10:53

onon4359 發表於 2016-12-29 23:48
黑夜之神都有30分鐘,星際啟示錄就成粒幾鐘!

但理論上用70mm菲林拍既黑夜之神畫質會好數碼拍既過星際啟示錄

jc2ssych · 發表於 2016-12-30 12:36

本帖最後由 jc2ssych 於 2016-12-30 12:46 編輯

SonSon 發表於 2016-12-30 10:53
但理論上用70mm菲林拍既黑夜之神畫質會好數碼拍既過星際啟示錄

亦有review含以下講法：

There's something exceptional about Interstellar that everyone should experience [...] , it was projected in 70mm, a format equal to the scale of its fantastic story, and shot on IMAX 65mm.

Shooting in 65mm IMAX and then transferring it over to a bigger 70mm print and projecting in the highest quality possible is something that almost no filmmaker gets to do in their career and something that every film-goer should see. The image quality is best in class providing rich colors, deep tones and lots of detail. And it's not going to be around much longer.

Source:
https://www.google.com.hk/amp/gi ... -android-sonymobile