[換電視]其實電視3D用主動式定被動式嘅好??

jasonfussy · 發表於 2015-7-23 11:39

如果想睇到更多76師兄嘅分享，快啲登入成為會員啦！

您需要登入收看或下載更多內容。還未成為會員？成為會員

x

呢排睇中左部Lg 55uf8500(被動式)同panasonic th-55ax670h(主動式)
2部機個規格同價錢都差唔多,係差在個3d有分別
其實有無話邊隻好d架??
利申:依家用緊部lg係用被動式
(Post76 Android 手機版送出)

多毛肥 · 發表於 2015-7-23 11:50

主動式係副眼鏡不停閃,要用電,你對眼比佢閃得耐會易倦

PP-HK · 發表於 2015-7-23 11:52

換言之在戲院裡的3D是否即是被動式?

wklie · 發表於 2015-7-23 11:59

本帖最後由 wklie 於 2015-7-23 12:06 編輯

PP-HK 發表於 2015-7-23 11:52
換言之在戲院裡的3D是否即是被動式?

Yes, RealD 3D in cinema is passive.

At home passive 3D loses half of the vertical resolution, i.e. Full HD panel 1080 lines become 540 for each eye (unless you have a 4K 2160p TV for 1080 Blu-ray 3D, then you can have full resolution 1080 passive 3D).
Since the models being considered are 4k, this is not a concern.

Home active 3D does not lose resolution, but it flickers and I feel very uncomfortable about it.