入門級價錢戲院級亨受....豬標呀佬 Studio 5

ctscts888

fatboy88 發表於 2015-5-17 00:44
呢期啲studio 5系被呢個post炒貴晒

就算貴左⋯⋯C/P值都高過其他品牌一大節啦⋯⋯
由其果D吹到天上有地下毛果D！

MDLP

ctscts888 發表於 2015-5-17 10:34
就算貴左⋯⋯C/P值都高過其他品牌一大節啦⋯⋯
由其果D吹到天上有地下毛果D！ ...

琴日試玩530配18"

buji

MDLP 發表於 2015-5-17 12:09
琴日試玩530配18"

請問ching效果如何？？
(Post76 Android 手機版送出)

風仔風仔仔

JAMO THX speaker都有推出好似JBL L820既款式,
睇網上評測, 平靚正.
D500, D600

http://www.jamo.com/speaker-lines/thx-speakers/D500/

風仔風仔仔

JAMO D500, D600三面發聲後置, 包圍感應該好過JBL L820

MDLP

風仔風仔仔 發表於 2015-5-17 15:03
JAMO THX speaker都有推出好似JBL L820既款式,
睇網上評測, 平靚正.
D500, D600

師兄有無留意市場上 HT THX 喇叭及後級已賣少見少？

MDLP

風仔風仔仔 發表於 2015-5-17 15:05
JAMO D500, D600三面發聲後置, 包圍感應該好過JBL L820

好多網上資料都話Dolby不建議用dipolar/bipolar喇叭去行atmos

http://blog.dolby.com/2014/09/do ... nemas-living-rooms/

At least for dipoles… not well. They have, by their design nature, a null area in the center of the speaker where the out-of-phase signals basically cancel each other out, which does not translate well for object based surround formats, not just Atmos.



http://www.highdefdigest.com/blog/dolby-atmos-home-demo/

Dolby recommends that you use all direct-firing speakers, not bipole or dipole, which will disperse the sound and make it diffuse.


http://www.highdefdigest.com/blog/dolby-atmos-home-demo/

Direct radiating speakers are recommended for all locations. One of the main advantages of Atmos is pinpoint localization in the soundfield. Bipole or dipole speakers will disperse the sound, and you may wind up with conflicts from speaker overlap.

The surrounds I use actually have a switch that allows me to choose between direct or dipole. If yours don’t, then unfortunately yes, you would probably need to replace your surround speakers.

MDLP

buji 發表於 2015-5-17 14:18
請問ching效果如何？？
(Post76 Android 手機版送出)

師兄你啱啱先換咗拾仔
都係唔好知咁多算

buji

MDLP 發表於 2015-5-17 20:32
師兄你啱啱先換咗拾仔
都係唔好知咁多算

(Post76 Android 手機版送出)

風仔風仔仔

MK SOUND既三面發聲環迴喇叭, 好似又唔係bipole, dipole,
咁樣, MK SOUND三面發聲喇叭適唔適合 ATOM, 或 DTS:X.