喇叭腳架 疑惑

chanwt

回復 30# qk8082900


    我當然唔係話"原廠最好", 但原廠係最有條件造最匹配既脚架! (我想是吧!)
至於副廠,佢哋係米都可以取得有關資料去設計呢!

我只係想傾下佢地點解可以做到如FDII咁受歡迎又百搭嘅腳架呢?

qk8082900

回復 31# chanwt


    FDII點解受歡迎同埋設計師點解可以較到對對喇叭放上去都可以改善
呢D你就要打電話問下個設計師
我個人就不太喜歡FDII

HOHOHO

回復  米赫洛域


如果剩係得我想知, 咁我真係有d失望   

都唔係答唔答我嘅? 我暫時都唔用腳 ...
chanwt 發表於 2012-1-15 22:06

Same feeling to me!
Actually I have a lot of question to ask, but rare have a satisfactory explanation.
Some questions even no answer!
You can check my pervious post as following for your reference:
http://www.post76.com/discuss/viewthread.php?tid=100228
http://www.post76.com/discuss/viewthread.php?tid=97786
http://www.post76.com/discuss/viewthread.php?tid=97153
http://www.post76.com/discuss/viewthread.php?tid=94071

chanwt

Same feeling to me!
Actually I have a lot of question to ask, but rare have a satisfact ...
HOHOHO 發表於 2012-1-17 18:27

    same same here! I think it is quite normal and ok if no ching reply because sometime they simply do not have the experience if the questions are asked in a very specific way.

But franky, I always get a little "piss off" when some chings simply say :" anything won't matter, just listen to your ear.." I mean it is not completely wron by saying such comment if you don't care about anything else but teh sonic performance, when you only consider the outcome, no the C/P value, not the specialty of the device. But I think most ching  come to AV or HiFi forum would like to know more. Especially experience earned by other ching. too..

Sorry.. no offence

obee

same same here! I think it is quite normal and ok if no ching reply because sometime they sim ...
chanwt 發表於 2012-1-17 18:59

Yes, there is no offense but we are not sengineers, we are just player or music lover. You can't expect an Hifi player or music player explain to you the technical reason behind.

chanwt

Yes, there is no offense but we are not sengineers, we are just player or music lover. You can't e ...
kenneth_obee 發表於 2012-1-17 20:19

Of course not! it never appeared in my mind!

Lester

same same here! I think it is quite normal and ok if no ching reply because sometime they sim ...
chanwt 發表於 2012-1-17 18:59

ching, 又吾洗咁勞氣,不過我覺得吾識吾係罪,吾識都無法架...
其實我同你一樣都有好多野吾明(其實係吾信), 由其是係在cas方面,
當初有人叫我"正正經經"買部cd機好過, 唉,而家玩cas有幾吾正經呀?火到我...

不過咁,你有無諗過hifi野點解咁貴? 其實好簡單,吾係因為成本,吾係因為難度,
係因為佢夠主觀,什麼叫好聲? 機A比 機B好聲幾多?無得計架,
無法量化既野從來都係最貴,有d人覺得比幾多錢都值,因為好食d,好飲d,靚d
不過無論有錢成點,你估有無人會用一百萬買部pc比自己用?(吾計保安需要) 我諗無啦,因為計到無需要,吾值
如果有人諗到方法可以張HIFI量化, 好似CPU 3GHZ vs 4GHZ = 快25%咁比,我包保大部分HIFI野要跌價五成以上.

另外仲有,HIfI野同科技係有一種似有還無既關係, 新出既SPEAKER, 代理一定話正過舊好多,不過你問D老人佢實話舊史D野好聲D,好力D
FDII 成名左咁耐,點解出吾到似樣既老番? 成6k一對照計利錢好大,如果可以好似ching咁諗張FDII成功既原因分析成幾個要素(什麼木呀,鐵呀)..
我諗100%老番一早出左, 其實我一直懷疑有好多hifi野連個designer都係知其然不知其所以然 知道要點整不過吾知點解咁整會好聲,
又或者直情係撞彩 靠try and error, 一直試到好聲,之後作一個理論落去, 你吾好似為好吾科學,事實上好多科學理論係咁作出黎, 先有現象,後有理論,之後發現個理論解釋吾到某個現象,就再作下改下出個新version出黎, 牛頓兄同呀愛因兄都係咁玩法

我之前post 答你用過音箱的比喻, 你諗真d, 真係好似,so far你見呢度d人評音箱你見佢地用咩標準?
99%係"我聽過,我覺得", 70%係"呢個牌子d聲底", 30%係"靈敏度", 30%係"佢用xx單完", 小過10%用"物料", 有無人可以有一個"比較有系統嘅諗法去試下分析下" 喇叭? 無lor

用左FDII之後,我覺得最大既改善吾係低音又吾係高音,係成個音場"定"左,定位好左, 點解我就真係吾知...玩下玩下...hifi好似已經變左信仰...

rockerlam

音響野好多時要買返黎玩過比較過先會明白，唔係自已親身試過有效，都無謂亂咁答人，費事害人買錯野。

obee

"又或者直情係撞彩 靠try and error, 一直試到好聲,之後作一個理論落去, 你吾好似為好吾科學,事實上好多科學理論係咁作出黎, 先有現象,後有理論,之後發現個理論解釋吾到某個現象,就再作下改下出個新version出黎, 牛頓兄同呀愛因兄都係咁玩法"....

Lester 你好牛啊！

Lester

"又或者直情係撞彩 靠try and error, 一直試到好聲,之後作一個理論落去, 你吾好似為好吾科學,事實上好多科 ...
kenneth_obee 發表於 2012-1-17 23:00

    我懷疑馬老板就係呢類人,靠經驗多過理論