之前份工忙到嘔,有幾年時間大部分信都冇睇過,而家仲成箱放咗喺床邊,都唔知點處置好{:6_137:}
(有諗過把心一橫燒哂佢算數)
C hing,not for argue, just for friendly discussion, the principal of JD is changeling the government decision is whether reasonable or ultra virus. Although they have state very clear, but if it unreasonable, the court can still judge it is invalid. U remember Mr Chan has win a case against the IR. Of course, whether u have enough resource to play with IR is another issue. Government action need to be fair and reasonable in theory no matter this action is justified by another statue or not. A not very good example, for the Philippine maid cases, the law already say Philippine maid will not have the right of abode in HK, then why still need to bring the case to the court?? It is because the claimant claim the law is against the basic law. In short, Government act can be challenged if you think they are unreasonable and act outside the power inferred.
本帖最後由 Pooh 於 2011-9-9 14:34 編輯
回復 32# supertenchung
師兄對法律都好熟喎。第日有法律問題實搵你指教。
稅局真係好低能，搞埋啲咁野，張報稅表又唔提人，真係好易中伏。佢梗係以為個個人都係讀法律。其實好似申請信用卡要有證明咁，申請父母免稅額時，就要交埋住址證明，咁咪好地地囉。三年後先秋後算帳，玩死人咩。最好有啲咩議員幫吓手，司法覆核吓。好過幫啲賓賓爭居留權，搬石頭"耷"腳趾咁戇居。
P.S. 我都無留意陳生打贏咗添，之前個官話如果個個都用收唔到稅局通知，稅務制度就會崩塌，咁宜家稅務制度咪即係崩塌咗?!{:6_134:}
C hing, thank you for your reply. In truth, u are right, being a normal people, really don;t have resource to play with IR or government, Better to follow their instruction. If not, IR may find another way to play with u! then PK la
