有冇考慮呢支
EF-S17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM
專為使用APS-C呎吋EOS 數碼單反光相機而設的大光圈標準變焦鏡頭 ...
ricoy288 發表於 2011-5-25 23:12 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
這支唔平！不過有zoom + 2.8 + IS canon 只有這支。夠輕夠sharp , 不上FF 的話比 24-70 2.8 更好。加支10-22 for wide
how old the children?
1. if plan no change on body, recommend 17-55 f/2.8IS..... IS+f/2.8, very useful for indoor.....
2. if plan to change FF body within 1-2 years, no choice, 24-105 f/4IS.
also, if the children is more than 3 years old, better get one 70-200, no matter it's f/2.8 or f/4.....very useful for all outdoor activities.
回復 29# mike384
80-200呢支好鏡來的!{:6_193:}
回復mike384
80-200呢支好鏡來的!
michaelwong 發表於 2011-5-27 14:38 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
識貨!!我支係AF-D 俗稱小黑三個支~
好多人嫌佢冇摩打冇VR, 寧願買色馬/譚龍, 但小弟獨愛呢支原廠舊鏡~以前D60時要手動都照玩~
回復 34# mike384
比起小黑六平很多, 留翻D錢買定焦鏡重好!
回復mike384
比起小黑六平很多, 留翻D錢買定焦鏡重好!
michaelwong 發表於 2011-5-27 17:45 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
係呀, 成皮野夠買384了!!
係呀, 成皮野夠買384了!!
mike384 發表於 2011-5-27 18:21 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
除了方便外, 定焦真係殺晒!
本帖最後由 seelam 於 2011-5-28 00:14 編輯
我之前有用到EF 28-135 IS，后來上年尾放左....
覺得由影菲林到而家咁多年，老鏡一支，色彩略為偏淡，所以放左
之后年頭入左支EF24-105 F/4 IS
而家長插係部7D 用緊，感覺良好﹗对焦快，sharp﹗
個女歲半多D ，已經識得周圍走，暫時影wide 同Tele 都應付到
d 人話驚唔夠wide，但係真係有幾何用到28mm 呢d 廣角呢﹖
早兩個月去狄狄尼，都有帶支Sigma 12-24mm 去，但係一次無用到....
以我影相習慣，呢個焦距已經應付到超過八成要影相
師兄如果有閒錢，咪去馬啦﹗
識貨!!我支係AF-D 俗稱小黑三個支~
好多人嫌佢冇摩打冇VR, 寧願買色馬/譚龍, 但小弟獨愛呢支原廠舊 ...
mike384 發表於 2011-5-27 15:47 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
係呀, 成皮野夠買384了!!
mike384 發表於 2011-5-27 18:21 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
I've both lenses too.{:6_240:}
I've both lenses too.
ysl 發表於 2011-5-28 19:58 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
384 & LB3? Or Lb6 ?
我雖有LB3但較少用，個人習慣啦，但70-200呢d真係影人利器，2.8都其實好夠，一般都收少少
