回復 9# leo25
我的想法是这样的，虽然是贵了点，但是sub同喇叭技術年年都没有大变化。买好的或者自己钟意的可以耐上好几年。无畏天天或者每年發癢，想着upgrade个sub.省下来的银子可以买多滴bluray自己享受下
Ching, I regret somehow to not buy F112 and F110 is still a good sub.
回復 12# yujeffhk
Ching，大，不代表好的。我的地方不大，我都home trial f112 and f110.结果，f112 D bass overwhelmed the room.D surround 同埋前置被 D bass 给淹没了。
回復leo25
我的想法是这样的，虽然是贵了点，但是sub同喇叭技術年年都没有大变化。买好的或者自己 ...
jan97 發表於 2011-5-1 18:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
{:6_158:} agree{:6_158:}
good ! good ! good !
But, if compare to SVS PB-13Ultra who will be better?{:6_138:}
回復 13# jan97
I understand more bass must be come from F112 but the result shouldn't be like that if the overall setting is fine. Ching, I'm not expert and, therefore, I do agree with making the right choice.
回復 13# jan97
WELL SAID
good ! good ! good !
But, if compare to SVS PB-13Ultra who will be better?
chinkc 發表於 2011-5-1 22:14 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
JL is better.i demoed SVS and Velodyne SPL1000U in the showroom. This is my observation:SVS has lots of rumble and quantity.But quality of bass not there. Bass is loose,no definition.Somehow, even the SPL1000U is better in terms of speed and layering. furthermore, ultra 13 is even more expensive than the f112. If want to buy SVS ultra 13, must as well buy the JL f112.
回復孤身走我路
其实我都想买Velodyne SPL1000U的，performance都不錯。可惜比JL贵1700，又是大陆做的 ...
jan97 發表於 2011-5-1 13:53 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
JL是美國造的, 好彩你冇揀錯.........{:1_351:}
JL....我都好鍾意{:6_122:}...都好想買{:6_198:}....但實在太貴喇......{:6_147:}
