Big_McIn
發表於 2010-10-26 13:49
玩唔玩Surround High/Wide
dio 發表於 2010-10-26 13:44 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
點解玩active?
除非PCM, ATC,否則聲粗。
dio
發表於 2010-10-26 14:17
Big_McIn
發表於 2010-10-26 14:40
ADAM ACTIVE 都幾好呀.又唔貴唔麻煩.
PMC 我都用過TB2+ PASSIVE.都幾好.
不過過左去算啦. ...
dio 發表於 2010-10-26 14:17 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Surround High/Wide都用Active?
dio
發表於 2010-10-26 14:42
Big_McIn
發表於 2010-10-26 14:46
我唔想咁多AMP咁煩.
師兄有咩指教不妨講.反正都未買.
thanks
dio 發表於 2010-10-26 14:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
如買清一式都用Active Spk就要買5508哩,佢全11 channels有XLR out,連接各Active Spk一定要Balance,呢啲係Pro 接駁基本點。
dio
發表於 2010-10-26 14:52
Big_McIn
發表於 2010-10-26 15:23
打算係咁.但效果未估到.
BTW 都唔係5508係唔係真平衡.
dio 發表於 2010-10-26 14:52 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
佢就一定唔係Balance線路,但有Balance Board,Signal經該board轉变為Balance signal 出。
Active Spk份Amp細細份,都係行board,但有Balance功能,過濾cable pick-up啲noise。
真正Balance線路嘅Processor要Mark Levinson先有,Lexicon 12HD都唔知係咪。
francis_leung21
發表於 2010-10-26 16:01
性能應該就係onkyo 高d..睇份料...但係馬仔平幾千...onkyo 就算好d...分別都唔算好大...係都係性格既分別...所以前級黎講馬仔抵玩...要求高d 就去揀歐美前級...肯定一換就分得出...但係價錢貴幾陪咁..
小瑟
發表於 2010-10-26 16:09
佢就一定唔係Balance線路,但有Balance Board,Signal經該board轉变為Balance signal 出。
Active Spk份 ...
Big_McIn 發表於 2010-10-26 15:23 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
雖然我都唔係好識真 BALANCE同假 BALANCE既分別, 不過5508咁既價如果話有真都冇人信呢!!!
dio
發表於 2010-10-26 16:12