focal 啦， 上次上阿二到試野爆過807v ，同806v真的很大分別 {:6_222:}
回復babuwa
I have tried 806 VS 807. 807 is better a lot than 806. Same comment as you.
randyma 發表於 2010-8-20 10:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
What amp Ching using now? even 807V esay to push (92dB), but I found it's require high current amp to show it's potential.{:6_234:}
I am now using Yamaha 665 with Marantz mm8003.
I am now using Yamaha 665 with Marantz mm8003.
randyma 發表於 2010-8-20 10:58 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Really good{:6_193:}, marantz amp is one of the good match with Focal. that should be great.{:6_184:}
回復 22# babuwa
我都見其他ching有講過focal係越推越有,睇黎要搵隻power amp餵下佢{:1_343:}
回復 24# babuwa
係,但係可能自己用緊low end馬仔,硬係覺包圍同定位差d,會唔會hi end model會好D?{:6_183:}
回復babuwa
係,但係可能自己用緊low end馬仔,硬係覺包圍同定位差d,會唔會hi end model會好D? ...
goro 發表於 2010-8-20 12:55 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Of course. Higher price with better performance la.
Quad12L2....濛??????
仲有一點係focal易推同埋夠唔夠力推既理論,我從另一位高人學了一套
所謂夠力,唔係代表大聲,部部amp都可以曹到拆天
夠力既定義係幾大聲都好,也能保持應有的細緻度,才叫夠力(當然大家可以同我位朋友既睇法唔同)
要定義何為夠力方法上,最簡單就是大聲得來又不覺炒耳,咁就ok
而focal本身就是一隻較尖的喇叭,如果開大聲少少而拆耳或失真,就已經唔係代表易推的了,只是本身聲音取向錯覺~
而focal本身就是一隻較尖的喇叭,如果開大聲少少而拆耳或失真,就已經唔係代表易推的了,只是本身聲音取向錯覺~
唔駛拆聲，我用 marantz 6004 av amp 直出唔駛大聲己經好失望.... 夠力水既av amp 好緊要，如果唔係的話要加power amp ，靚既 av amp + power amp .... 天與地{:6_176:}
