Vigilante 發表於 2016-12-29 10:57 static/image/common/back.gif
It's really hard to say because the film wasn't originally shot in 4K. Remastering it won't help t ...
35mm 菲林解像度已有4k質素..............
VXNHNqcceuY
本帖最後由 jc2ssych 於 2016-12-29 20:03 編輯
35mm film原生超越4k是肯定的（好似係近8k）。
但話分兩頭，Nolan所有作品嘅IMAX篇幅，只佔片長不到10%；而 Dark Knight trilogy 故事整體都係夜景，無論地面或地下。換句話說，家庭影碟的4K，要處理埋在暗黑場景的 non-IMAX filming 的 undesirable 雜訊，是有難度的。睇 BD 1080 都可能唔太覺，但4k要做到全片全滑淨畫面，頗花功夫！
本帖最後由 onon4359 於 2016-12-29 23:50 編輯
jc2ssych 發表於 2016-12-29 19:58 static/image/common/back.gif
35mm film原生超越4k是肯定的（好似係近8k）。
但話分兩頭，Nolan所有作品嘅IMAX篇幅，只佔片長不到10%； ...
黑夜之神都有30分鐘,星際啟示錄就成粒幾鐘!
樓上師兄正確。
更正：IMAX footage length
The Dark Knight - almost 20 mins
The Dark Knight Rises - 72 mins
Interstellar - over an hour
onon4359 發表於 2016-12-29 23:48 static/image/common/back.gif
黑夜之神都有30分鐘,星際啟示錄就成粒幾鐘!
但理論上用70mm菲林拍既黑夜之神畫質會好數碼拍既過星際啟示錄
本帖最後由 jc2ssych 於 2016-12-30 12:46 編輯
SonSon 發表於 2016-12-30 10:53 static/image/common/back.gif
但理論上用70mm菲林拍既黑夜之神畫質會好數碼拍既過星際啟示錄
亦有review含以下講法：
There's something exceptional about Interstellar that everyone should experience [...] , it was projected in 70mm, a format equal to the scale of its fantastic story, and shot on IMAX 65mm.
Shooting in 65mm IMAX and then transferring it over to a bigger 70mm print and projecting in the highest quality possible is something that almost no filmmaker gets to do in their career and something that every film-goer should see. The image quality is best in class providing rich colors, deep tones and lots of detail. And it's not going to be around much longer.
Source:
https://www.google.com.hk/amp/gizmodo.com/the-best-reason-to-see-interstallar-its-part-of-a-dyin-1654054430/amp?client=ms-android-sonymobile
onon4359 發表於 2016-12-29 01:58 static/image/common/back.gif
我都想黑夜之神出4K,想知IMAX拍既鏡正唔正D
用UB900 upscale已經好正{:1_326:}
DVD迷 發表於 2016-12-28 22:25
正，請教加版有中字嗎？
蝙蝠俠超人有齊粵語同中文字幕。
朗 發表於 2017-5-18 21:44
蝙蝠俠超人有齊粵語同中文字幕。
等你答案好辛苦……足足要等半年才見到一個答案{:6_140:}
講笑炸{:6_139:}
