[換電視]其實電視3D用主動式定被動式嘅好??
呢排睇中左部Lg 55uf8500(被動式)同panasonic th-55ax670h(主動式)2部機個規格同價錢都差唔多,係差在個3d有分別
其實有無話邊隻好d架??
利申:依家用緊部lg係用被動式
(Post76 Android 手機版送出) 主動式係副眼鏡不停閃,要用電,你對眼比佢閃得耐會易倦 換言之在戲院裡的3D是否即是被動式? 本帖最後由 wklie 於 2015-7-23 12:06 編輯
PP-HK 發表於 2015-7-23 11:52 static/image/common/back.gif
換言之在戲院裡的3D是否即是被動式?
Yes, RealD 3D in cinema is passive.
At home passive 3D loses half of the vertical resolution, i.e. Full HD panel 1080 lines become 540 for each eye (unless you have a 4K 2160p TV for 1080 Blu-ray 3D, then you can have full resolution 1080 passive 3D).
Since the models being considered are 4k, this is not a concern.
Home active 3D does not lose resolution, but it flickers and I feel very uncomfortable about it. PP-HK 發表於 2015-7-23 11:52 static/image/common/back.gif
換言之在戲院裡的3D是否即是被動式?
i係,LG副超是可以攞去戲院用的 乜式都好, 3D唔好只聽其他人意見, 自己睇得舒服最重要 必定被動!!
(Post76 Android 手機版送出) 我個人like主動。
(Post76 Android 手機版送出) 被動好冇疊影唔駛差電換電,雖然解像減半,但唔覺有問題。但我投影機同電視都是主動 (被動式){:6_193:}
頁:
[1]
2