googleli 發表於 2009-9-27 09:07

請問各位師兄, 玩Bi-wire係咪會容易燒AMP?

請問各位師兄, 玩Bi-wire係咪會容易燒AMP?
如果我唔係用Surround Back出玩Bi-wire,
而係齋用Front出,
利用條線本身去到喇叭果邊分開兩邊咁玩 (Sound from Heaven)
係咪會好容易燒AMP? 謝謝.

hohodog900 發表於 2009-9-27 09:20

用surround amp 自己個surround back 出bi-amp 應該好安全,通常都有內部保險,最緊要個Amp set 番bi-amp front。
bi-amp 力水好咗,分別比玩bi-wire 大。

googleli 發表於 2009-9-27 10:35

用surround amp 自己個surround back 出bi-amp 應該好安全,通常都有內部保險,最緊要個Amp set 番bi-amp front。
bi-amp 力水好咗,分別比玩bi-wire 大。
hohodog900 發表於 2009-9-27 09:20 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

唔該晒師兄!咁如果唔用Bi-Amp, 只係用Front出, 但係用Bi-wire的話, 會唔會容易燒機? 謝謝!

Beginner 發表於 2009-9-27 10:39

Should be no problem since you just replace the metal bridge with wire.

cmsjkung 發表於 2009-9-27 11:08

本帖最後由 cmsjkung 於 2009-9-27 18:31 編輯

請問各位師兄, 玩Bi-wire係咪會容易燒AMP?
如果我唔係用Surround Back出玩Bi-wire,
而係齋用Front出,
利用條線本身去到喇叭果邊分開兩邊咁玩 (Sound from Heaven)
係咪會好容易燒AMP? 謝謝. ...
googleli 發表於 2009-9-27 09:07 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

Bi-wire and Bi-amp are two different things... For Bi-wire, you need a speaker cable and make it as 2 input to 4 output.. For Bi-amp, you need to use surround back connect to front speaker, remove the speaker jumper, and change the front speaker setting to Bi-amp in AV AMP...

{:6_122:}

Beginner 發表於 2009-9-27 11:27



Bi-wire and Bi-amp are two different things... For Bi-wire, you need a double run speaker cable and make it as 2 input to 4 output.. For Bi-amp, you need to use surround back connect to front speake ...
cmsjkung 發表於 2009-9-27 11:08 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

So, my understanding on the configuration is not correct.Thanks for your information
{:1_351:}

kennethtcp 發表於 2009-9-27 11:29



Bi-wire and Bi-amp are two different things... For Bi-wire, you need a double run speaker cable and make it as 2 input to 4 output.. For Bi-amp, you need to use surround back connect to front speake ...
cmsjkung 發表於 2009-9-27 11:08 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

bi-wire 都要 remove jumper, 不過唔 remove 都唔會燒機, 因為實際上你個 output source 都係同一個位, 只係 bi-wire 果時條 jumper replaced by 另一條喇叭線
bi-amp 就一定要飛走條 jumper, 因為個 source 唔同左, 唔飛走條 jumper 會 short 埋兩個 source...d amp 既 spec 寫就寫有 overcurrent protection, 實際會唔會 trap 我就未試過, 不過有 potential 燒既動作都唔會俾佢發生就得啦

googleli 發表於 2009-9-27 11:38

師兄, 真係謝謝你的解答, 咁如果Bi-wire的話 (不是Bi-Amp) 係咪都係remove jumper好D呢?

cmsjkung 發表於 2009-9-27 11:39

本帖最後由 cmsjkung 於 2009-9-27 11:41 編輯



bi-wire 都要 remove jumper, 不過唔 remove 都唔會燒機, 因為實際上你個 output source 都係同一個位, 只係 bi-wire 果時條 jumper replaced by 另一條喇叭線
bi-amp 就一定要飛走條 jumper, 因為個 source 唔同 ...
kennethtcp 發表於 2009-9-27 11:29 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

Oh.... Forgot to said to remove the speaker jumper for Bi-wire......

{:6_123:}

Yes, it is better to remove the jumper for Bi-wire, otherwise no point to do Bi-wire....

cmsjkung 發表於 2009-9-27 11:43

My MA RX-8 and RX centre provide better performance using Bi-wire...
頁: [1] 2
查看完整版本: 請問各位師兄, 玩Bi-wire係咪會容易燒AMP?

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。