A16新版個性價比唔值....進步幅度同加咗既價唔成正比....比多少少買原廠....
都差成三千蚊架,師兄諗諗喇
A16新版個性價比唔值....進步幅度同加咗既價唔成正比....比多少少買原廠....
smalltaste 發表於 2009-10-2 14:18 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
如都會上FF, 不如 16-35啦, 一步到位, 唔會再心思思換鏡. 鏡唔會好似音響甘成日換, 早買早享受, 米當供.{:6_134:}
38# 小瑟
2nd 18-55IS only $600 ja wor..
導演 發表於 2009-10-2 11:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
600??? 6000對嗎?!?!?
我都係唔舍得呢~~~~~{:1_262:}
18-55IS kit lens is a compact lens f3.5-5.6, just $600 or below
maybe u talk about the 17-55 f2.8, the price around 7k
18-55IS kit lens is a compact lens f3.5-5.6, just $600 or below
maybe u talk about the 17-55 f2.8, the price around 7k
導演 發表於 2009-10-7 15:19 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
哦, 原來你係講 KITS果枝呀??? 唔係卦, 我枝 17-85IS都唔夠枝 18-55IS KIT黎?? 你咁樣好 HURT我喎~~~~{:1_247:}
哦, 原來你係講 KITS果枝呀??? 唔係卦, 我枝 17-85IS都唔夠枝 18-55IS KIT黎?? 你咁樣好 HURT我喎~~~~{:1_247:}
小瑟 發表於 2009-10-7 15:30 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
唔講成像, 只講造工, 一拿起支kit 18-55, 你可能會覺得佢好輕好玩具. 不過好多人都話佢甘既價錢, 可以拍得唔錯, 用嚟玩下係值得.
17-85 我當時買第一部單反時, 嘜都唔識, 結果就入左40D kit. 最後都放左支17-85, 用24-105代替.{:6_128:}
唔講成像, 只講造工, 一拿起支kit 18-55, 你可能會覺得佢好輕好玩具. 不過好多人都話佢甘既價錢, 可以拍得唔錯, 用嚟玩下係值得.
17-85 我當時買第一部單反時, 嘜都唔識, 結果就入左40D kit. 最後都放左支17-85, 用 ...
ricoy288 發表於 2009-10-7 15:45 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
我依家就係步你後塵中, 不過又唔舍得買咁貴既鏡.......不過枝 17-85真係咁唔掂, 連枝 18-55既成像都好過佢嗎!??!?!
我依家就係步你後塵中, 不過又唔舍得買咁貴既鏡.......不過枝 17-85真係咁唔掂, 連枝 18-55既成像都好過佢嗎!??!?!
小瑟 發表於 2009-10-7 17:02 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
兩我都用過，我都係覺得17－85好D, 不過呢D野好睇個人要求． 但最低限度唔可以否認17－85個range 係好過18－55.{:6_136:}
其實where可以買到2手18-55 is kit len , 我現在用個枝是18-55沒有 is, 所以成日比boss說{:6_235:}影到佢好"mo"{:6_216:}
