for quality, sure Canon. it is very sharp at F2.8.
while A16 i found it's colour is too red.
我枝A16都差不多三年. 不過 2.8光圈時都幾明顯無咁sharp. 原來已經係原廠既八成. 咁就真係唔錯.
btw, sigma果枝好似都okay. 不過我自己真係唔多鍾意sigma既鏡身既皮. ...
radhk 發表於 2009-9-11 21:34 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
原廠就真係貴就貴在2.8都好鬼sharp~
但係A16都真係比我想像中好, 起碼樣樣都幾平均~
Sigma有d鏡真係有d驚喜~
不知不覺都原來擁有左三支Sigma鏡~
不過佢鏡身個coating又真係怪怪, 雖然好啜手, 但係硬係覺得佢好似d刮刮咭果層銀錦, 一刮就甩~ {:6_146:}
nel哥咁高要求都話得,咁就一定入得過啦~ {:6_193:}
ssss41357 發表於 2009-9-11 19:46 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Sam哥你硬係鍾意玩小弟o既~ {:6_123:}
幾時一齊出黎影吓相呀~
canon有枝新野出,EF-S 15-85 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
不過又肯定係貴喇
本帖最後由 ronaldlaw 於 2009-9-28 02:07 編輯
講漏左, 我地都係用30d, 最多玩到8d 或者 5dmk3 (or whatever) 都會upgrade了
若果行FF條路而家就唔好洗太多去efs鏡lu ~ ($多除外 )
反之選7d 或以後既apsc機, 一q過去 efs 18-55is的確係好好既選擇
事實上成像一定好過支a16
lemonstar 發表於 2009-9-11 23:27 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
7D個spec真係好吸引, 但係upgrade又唔上FF感覺怪怪的...
本帖最後由 ronaldlaw 於 2009-9-28 02:12 編輯
17-55 2.8........ 呢枝係典型 "無紅圈既 L 鏡" !!
如果唔用 FF 機的話, 真係買得過 (雖然你會發現, tele 只得 55, 其實未必要用 is)
Raphael 發表於 2009-9-11 15:07 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
我借個friend個支17-55試過, 隻手震住黎影分別好大呀!
呢支17-55嘜都好, 唯一唔好就係佢係外伸縮唔係好似支17-40咁內伸縮....
防震呢個function就點都有好過無既. 平時最多off 0左佢.
不過, ronald兄個case, 都唔係太暗, 推到ISO 800都okay.
btw, tamron都出0左防震version.
canon有枝新野出,EF-S 15-85 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
不過又肯定係貴喇
sharpmd 發表於 2009-9-12 14:36 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
我想換F2.8既鏡.........!!!
我借個friend個支17-55試過, 隻手震住黎影分別好大呀!
呢支17-55嘜都好, 唯一唔好就係佢係外伸縮唔係好似支17-40咁內伸縮....
ronaldlaw 發表於 2009-9-28 02:02 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
嘩........正, 仲有 SAMPLE添~~~
IS開同唔開真係差好遠喎~~~~
A16應該2600禁上下, 真係非常抵用~
Nikon支17-55 f2.8我都擁有過, lee支野都出名利, 雖然我冇做過AB比較, 但係感覺上有支原廠起碼八成, 但係價錢就係三分一啫~ {:6_193:} ...
ahnel 發表於 2009-9-11 15:33 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
就係個價錢吸引到我呢!!!!!
CANON鏡太貴了~~~~
