supertenchung 發表於 2009-9-10 20:42

i think better to listen by yourself, buy the one u like, instead of the one have higher resell value.

maner394 發表於 2009-9-10 20:45

帥兄我個 Plan 係咁 幫幫手睇睇
DENON AV-AMP
Plan 1:
前置: JBL ES30 (唔知幾錢)
中置: JBL ES25C (唔知幾錢)
後置: 已有

Plan 2:
前置: Klipsch RB61 ($3,600)
中置: Klipsch RC-52 ($2,500)
後置: 已有 ...
eggcake92 發表於 2009-9-10 20:34 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif前置: Klipsch RB61 ($3,600)
中置: Klipsch RC-52 ($2,500)
用緊........本人覺得超正{:6_193:}

rlwk2009 發表於 2009-9-10 20:46

唔洗諗啦就喱個啦,一定唔後悔:(因為 JBL 比較入門嘅喇叭D聲同以前完全唔同哂了)
前置: Klipsch RB61 ($3,600)
中置: Klipsch RC-52 ($2,500)
後置: 已有
個人意見不喜勿插{:6_235:}

claero 發表於 2009-9-10 20:46



我用JBL E30 ,反而覺得JBL 的BASS 打得太自然,無乜力
ronan 發表於 2009-9-10 19:21 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif


i never hear e30 , but i try klipsch , the mid sounds thin but fast ,i have 2 friends using whole set klipsch , they both told me its thin and not good for concert or cd ,they mean not pass on cd part .andi like thicker voice . you can take a look at nht , will give you enough punch for sure .

claero 發表於 2009-9-10 20:59

帥兄我個 Plan 係咁 幫幫手睇睇
DENON AV-AMP
Plan 1:
前置: JBL ES30 (唔知幾錢)
中置: JBL ES25C (唔知幾錢)
後置: 已有

Plan 2:
前置: Klipsch RB61 ($3,600)
中置: Klipsch RC-52 ($2,500)
後置: 已有 ...
eggcake92 發表於 2009-9-10 20:34 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

will you listen music ? or u are going to have another system for music ?

i think you better check the price first and listen to both and see which sound you like the most . but still if base on the same price ,i will go for 3 or 4 way speaker instead of2 way because i 've been up grade from 2 way to 3 way , and the different was obvious.

eggcake92 發表於 2009-9-10 21:01

我有一套 2 channel setup
呢套用來睇 Moive

THX 帥兄

ronan 發表於 2009-9-10 21:01

我以前用denon 1604 amp + jbl e30 ,聽歌人聲好暖同好厚,低音都打得幾勁,但依家換左onkyo sr707 後,感覺上對jbl e30 好似變左kef, mission 果d 喇叭咁,人聲薄,偏高音,無乜bass

對e30 當時起showroom 買,聽cd 真係幾正下,人聲暖和厚,把人聲好似起個喇叭中浮出黎咁,分析力又好,當睇電影時,非常有氣勢,唔通jbl 要配harmon amp 先好?

eggcake92 發表於 2009-9-10 21:02

JBL 果 set 係 3-way
同 去到 40kHz.....

ronan 發表於 2009-9-10 21:07

20# eggcake92

horn 喇叭的特性係efficiency 高,擴散力好,因為戲院地方大,用左horn 喇叭,可以保證坐得後一後的人,都可以聽得到應有的高音,但horn 喇叭係由大聲公演變出黎,所以聲底會幾metallic ,所以好多人都話點解戲院睇戲,會咁有大聲公feel ,所以聽歌都唔多會好

唔信的話你留意下,hifi的喇叭,好少用horn 喇叭的

claero 發表於 2009-9-10 21:09

我以前用denon 1604 amp + jbl e30 ,聽歌人聲好暖同好厚,低音都打得幾勁,但依家換左onkyo sr707 後,感覺上對jbl e30 好似變左kef, mission 果d 喇叭咁,人聲薄,偏高音,無乜bass

thats onkyo style ..... i use 905 before and i have the similarproblem ,i have the bass but the mid was gone , but the high was good .i sold it at last .its hard to find amp that suit taste and speaker both.

對e30 當時起showroom 買,聽cd 真係幾正下,人聲暖和厚,把人聲好似起個喇叭中浮出黎咁,分析力又好,當睇電影時,非常有氣勢,唔通jbl 要配harmon amp 先好?

thats good,if u did hear it sound good and u like , i think you can try try other band . at least u know it can sound as what you want .{:1_253:}
頁: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
查看完整版本: JBL vs Kilpsch ?

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。