StoneAge 發表於 2013-5-4 18:51 static/image/common/back.gif
一萬蚊度
不如ching俾多少少試只法國佬 JMR EUTERPE 喇叭
而家旺角中僑19/F舊代理做清貨大減價{: ...
有無聽過? 好唔好得過我依家對LS50? {:6_183:}
CHING 可以帶自己啲碟同約朋友去聽吓{:6_235:}
個四眼哥哥好NICE同好人{:6_193:}
試完聽完1-2鐘都全程唔會黑臉{:6_193:}
樓主,你個source係咩source?
patkwok 發表於 2013-5-4 19:32 static/image/common/back.gif
樓主,你個source係咩source?
電腦ITUNES, 自己喺ITUNES轉既AIFF檔, AIRPLAY去marantz CR603, 再落胆機度...
Hi there
Yes. If you want better Mids, stick with bookshelves. 100%
Yes. The KEF LS50 sounded better after 100 hours. Especially the mids. I owned a pair. Great speakers!
Your source may need upgrade too :) If possible, buy a DAC.
PC/ iTunes -> DAC -> Amp > LS50.
May be like this one:
http://www.whathifi.com/review/dacmagic
Hope this helps.
holliswhy 發表於 2013-5-4 19:51 static/image/common/back.gif
Hi there
Yes. If you want better Mids, stick with bookshelves. 100%
明白, THX C-HING既提點{:6_208:}
不過又有多左樣野想問了, 為何書架喇叭既"中音"會好過座地喇叭既中音架呢?{:6_194:}
slck01234586 發表於 2013-5-4 19:41 static/image/common/back.gif
電腦ITUNES, 自己喺ITUNES轉既AIFF檔, AIRPLAY去marantz CR603, 再落胆機度...
建議唔好換喇叭住。
我想你試試用條mini-phone jet轉紅白線，由mac機個analog output直駁部CR603出聲聽一聽，先唔好理分析力是否差了，聽聽高、中、低音的比重是否不同了？ 如果感覺舒服D的話，便可從source著手而非換喇叭。如果都係咁差，反正不用花錢試下無妨，煲耐D喇叭再算。
師兄，你對喇叭只係買左一個月，仲未完全煲好，比D耐性煲好先，起碼半年！仲有要聽吾同類型既歌去煲！否則下個月你又會話toy tower都未夠好！
Small enclosure. Easier to control vibration and resonance.
Large enclosure. Harder to control vibration and resonance.
Also, more material is needed in the larger cabinate. So if you paid the same money... ($10,000HKD), then the bookshelves would benefit more. i.e. more quality than quantity...?
本帖最後由 nicknick 於 2013-5-4 20:14 編輯
slck01234586 發表於 2013-5-4 19:59 static/image/common/back.gif
明白, THX C-HING既提點
不過又有多左樣野想問了, 為何書架喇叭既"中音"會好過座地喇叭既中音 ...
唔係中音好唔好過座地，而係高、中、低音都係講緊3者的比重，其中一部份過多的話就會覺得另外兩部份不足，
你感覺低音過多，咪自然會覺得高中音不足；
一般來說座地喇叭的低音會勁過書架喇叭，如果書架喇叭你都嫌低音過多，咁換了座地的低音咪仲多？咪更加覺得高中音唔夠？
