terryc 發表於 2013-5-10 22:13

kklck 發表於 2013-5-10 21:00 static/image/common/back.gif
未聽過, 只係爬文都有幾高評價, 而家應該無新既試吧, 二手個個都話不試音.... ...

我知有二手店可先試後買{:8_390:}

kklck 發表於 2013-5-10 22:55

terryc 發表於 2013-5-10 22:13 static/image/common/back.gif
我知有二手店可先試後買

邊度呀CHING, 講黎聽下{:8_395:}

terryc 發表於 2013-5-10 23:11

kklck 發表於 2013-5-10 22:55 static/image/common/back.gif
邊度呀CHING, 講黎聽下

Check pm!

sokwan 發表於 2013-5-11 00:08

You might go to Odyssey Audio to listen to TAD 300 as it use the speakers (as well as ATC) for their W4S DACs and AMPs.

If you really goes for TAD 300, please don't choose SLH 3 as its crossover is much inferior.I had been using TAD 300 for 8 years until 2 years ago. It is a pair of wonderful speakers. But it is very demanding!!! One thing is that it is highly revealing ---you can easily tell when you change IC, SC, amps, source, or each placement; that means it shows all the weaknesses of your system in front of you. It is easy to drive, but not easy to drive well for good sounds. There are very few chings able to reveal its full potential, except for some very senior ones, like7308 in R33. If you drive it using Tube amp, you have one with very good output transformers, like Audio Note. If other than tube amps, Linn and Rega are good choices too.

And it is best to have it placed horizontally with "stands" of 28-30 inches high (at least 6 feet apart, better over 8 feet).

kklck 發表於 2013-5-11 14:46

terryc 發表於 2013-5-10 23:11 static/image/common/back.gif
Check pm!

thanks ching~

kklck 發表於 2013-5-11 14:54

sokwan 發表於 2013-5-11 00:08 static/image/common/back.gif
You might go to Odyssey Audio to listen to TAD 300 as it use the speakers (as well as ATC) for their ...

多謝ching意見~
ching有冇比例過SLH3同300仔聲音既分別? 爬文其他ching話2隻聲好接近, 好少分別

sokwan 發表於 2013-5-11 17:31

kklck 發表於 2013-5-11 14:54 static/image/common/back.gif
多謝ching意見~
ching有冇比例過SLH3同300仔聲音既分別? 爬文其他ching話2隻聲好接近, 好少分別 ...

Unfortunately, I have not had a chance to compare the two speakers side-by-side. I listened to SLH3 once in a home visit. The sound character is just like TAD 300. I only know (told by another ching who owned the two speakers and looked at their inner structure) that the crossover for the two speakers are different (one designed by Pioneer, the other by TAD) and all elses are the same. And I was told (& further confirmed by the sole agent) that TAD 300 was in fact made in the US rather than in Japan (even though it was labelled as made in Japan).



kklck 發表於 2013-5-11 22:02

sokwan 發表於 2013-5-11 17:31 static/image/common/back.gif
Unfortunately, I have not had a chance to compare the two speakers side-by-side. I listened to SLH ...

多謝CHING寶貴資料

terryc 發表於 2013-5-11 22:20

kklck 發表於 2013-5-11 22:02 static/image/common/back.gif
多謝CHING寶貴資料

師兄比多少少上高一級,底頻量感全勝三百仔!{:8_390:}

Lester 發表於 2013-5-11 22:47

sokwan 發表於 2013-5-11 17:31 static/image/common/back.gif
Unfortunately, I have not had a chance to compare the two speakers side-by-side. I listened to SLH ...

係未真架, TAD 同 Pioneer 明明係同一間野黎wor
頁: 1 [2] 3
查看完整版本: PIONEER SLH3 / TAD300

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。