用咗變形鏡就無咗pixel to pixel
但畫面光度同臨場感都好啲
睇自已需要啦
本帖最後由 gxxrge 於 2013-3-12 22:24 編輯
chhanthony 發表於 2013-3-12 21:40 static/image/common/back.gif
用咗變形鏡就無咗pixel to pixel
但畫面光度同臨場感都好啲
睇自已需要啦
Supposingly play blu-ray movie (with native aspect ratio of 2.35: 1),
then using anamorphic len to throw to 2.35 :1 screen with image adjusted to 2.35:1,
How is the pixel to pixel?
gxxrge 發表於 2013-3-12 21:57 static/image/common/back.gif
Supposingly play blu-ray movie (with native aspect ratio of 2.35: 1),
then using anamorphic len t ...
一般用變形鏡會先將2.35:1畫面拉長成16：9
再用變形鏡拉闊成2.35:1
而喺16：9轉2.35:1時已經令到個畫面唔係點對點
以上係一兩年前嘅玩法
樓主個變形鏡我未見過
可能有新科技我唔識{:1_352:}
chhanthony 發表於 2013-3-12 23:34 static/image/common/back.gif
一般用變形鏡會先將2.35:1畫面拉長成16：9
再用變形鏡拉闊成2.35:1
而喺16：9轉2.35:1時已經令到個畫面唔 ...
Just for sharing:
Are anamorphic lenses needed (or even beneficial) with Blu-Ray as a source?
http://www.avforums.com/forums/projectors/1179777-anamorphic-lenses-needed-even-beneficial-blu-ray-source.html
gxxrge 發表於 2013-3-13 02:21 static/image/common/back.gif
Just for sharing:
Are anamorphic lenses needed (or even beneficial) with Blu-Ray as a source?
htt ...
thanks for sharing
都係果句睇自已需要啦{:1_249:}
chhanthony 發表於 2013-3-12 23:34 static/image/common/back.gif
一般用變形鏡會先將2.35:1畫面拉長成16：9
再用變形鏡拉闊成2.35:1
而喺16：9轉2.35:1時已經令到個畫面唔 ...
師兄:
何謂點對點?
請指教。
本帖最後由 chhanthony 於 2013-3-13 15:47 編輯
gxxrge 發表於 2013-3-13 13:29 static/image/common/back.gif
師兄:
何謂點對點?
gxxrge兄
你上面quote AVS forum個post好似有答案
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixel_mapping
