thaddeusma 發表於 2009-7-7 18:23

change to Yamaha Amp la, can use 7.2

Travice 發表於 2009-7-7 19:11

change to Yamaha Amp la, can use 7.2
thaddeusma 發表於 2009-7-7 18:23 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
隻 606 買o左唔夠 三個月 ... 即刻換 amp ... 俾人小死呀!!!
依家隻 606 都唔值錢 (因為 607) ...

onkyo 無得玩 2個 subwoofer o架?

thaddeusma 發表於 2009-7-7 19:14

換啦換啦......{:6_222:}

lamdog 發表於 2009-7-7 19:31


隻 606 買o左唔夠 三個月 ... 即刻換 amp ... 俾人小死呀!!!
依家隻 606 都唔值錢 (因為 607) ...

onkyo 無得玩 2個 subwoofer o架?
Travice 發表於 2009-7-7 19:11 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

607 係可以玩7.2架!

hellowe 發表於 2009-7-7 21:16


點樣整到 用兩隻 sub 仔呀???
我依家都用 nanosat 5.1 呀 ... 用 amp 606 ...
Travice 發表於 2009-7-7 18:22 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

因已買607,所以可以7.2.. 另外,若要加多個十仔,各位C-hing有mug好建議?120-150呎廳{:1_332:}

stm 發表於 2009-7-7 21:26

我又無諗過BOSE,搵日去試下先!
本來我試完HGB都想去馬,奈何個十仔太大.......無計! 屋企大多障礙物,真係好難擺咁大個十仔{:6_123:}

65# lamdog

lamdog 發表於 2009-7-7 21:33



因已買607,所以可以7.2.. 另外,若要加多個十仔,各位C-hing有mug好建議?120-150呎廳{:1_332:}
hellowe 發表於 2009-7-7 21:16 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

你試左夠唔夠玩先再考慮買多隻sub好過啦! {:1_351:}

lamdog 發表於 2009-7-7 21:34

我又無諗過BOSE,搵日去試下先!
本來我試完HGB都想去馬,奈何個十仔太大.......無計! 屋企大多障礙物,真係好難擺咁大個十仔{:6_123:}

65# lamdog
stm 發表於 2009-7-7 21:26 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

所以真係要好睇屋企既地方,最緊要岩用,唔岩用比套座地喇叭都發揮唔到佢既威力!

symrise 發表於 2009-7-7 21:50

ching 我同意你講,不過MX係七千頭,唔使八千幾。
中置唔夠大我諗係MX弱點 (even 我響 < 100" 地方用)
其他都okay.....

63# lamdog
stm 發表於 2009-7-7 11:26 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

I tested both nanosat and mx at show room and finally decided to go for mx because mm6 really impressed me. For me the performance difference between nanosat and mx satellites was not huge especially for my limited listening space.
I did worried about the centre channel but this could be solved by simply upgrading the centre speaker.

I tested kef 3005se also. Sound was great but just didn't fancy its looks as well as the power and build quality of its subwoofer.

symrise 發表於 2009-7-7 21:51

ching 我同意你講,不過MX係七千頭,唔使八千幾。
中置唔夠大我諗係MX弱點 (even 我響 < 100" 地方用)
其他都okay.....

63# lamdog
stm 發表於 2009-7-7 11:26 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif

I tested both nanosat and mx at show room and finally decided to go for mx because mm6 really impressed me. For me the performance difference between nanosat and mx satellites was not huge especially for my limited listening space.
I did worried about the centre channel but this could be solved by simply upgrading the centre speaker.

I tested kef 3005se also. Sound was great but just didn't fancy its looks as well as the power and build quality of its subwoofer.
頁: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9
查看完整版本: 終於敗左套5.1返黎[加左測試 p.6]

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。