billymud 發表於 2013-1-18 20:47

本帖最後由 billymud 於 2013-1-18 21:07 編輯

這些fuses是both end 套住 with pigtail cap.The pig-tail is welded (not soldering) for reliability.
The whole fuse assembly can be 攞出來, by desoldering the pigtail points on the board.it takes just 2 minutes; 容易呢 !
be noted that fuse filaments are soldered to it's end caps with a small piece of solder.The pig-tail caps were force-fit as a post process per customer
request.And, that's it.Never 拉開少少兩邊pig-tailcap 腳.Even 0.5m/m都唔可以; once pulled, the fuse is deformed and failed.


By the way, this picture shows those fuse filaments are in diagonal placement (對角線的).That represented a low-tech manufacturing technology (e.g. cheap cheap mainland backyard factories....) was applied.Replace it with a quality fuse from other "Brand" is highly recommended.

billymud 發表於 2013-1-18 20:49

本帖最後由 billymud 於 2013-1-18 20:55 編輯

ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-18 11:33 static/image/common/back.gif
現在冇事, 暫時唔攪住啦.

your picture shows those fuse filaments are in diagonal placement (對角線的).That represented a low-tech manufacturing technology (e.g. cheap cheap mainland backyard factories....) was applied.
Replace it with a quality fuse from other "Brand" is highly recommended.{:1_262:}

you can also buy fuse holders from Wah-Fai, SSP.$6 for two pieces la~~
with fuse holders, you've the freedom to apply discrete fuses, from $1/pc to $1,000/pc.    {:1_352:}

ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-19 10:09

billymud 發表於 2013-1-18 20:47 static/image/common/back.gif
這些fuses是both end 套住 with pigtail cap.The pig-tail is welded (not soldering) for reliability....

唔該晒師兄的畫圖解釋 {:1_245:} 請問filaments"對角線擺放"同"平衡擺放"的聲音有什麼分別 {:1_342:} 因為未試驗過!

billymud 發表於 2013-1-19 11:57

ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-19 10:09 static/image/common/back.gif
唔該晒師兄的畫圖解釋請問filaments"對角線擺放"同"平衡擺放"的聲音有什麼分別因 ...

  師兄,前者可以在backyard手作坊製造,後者採用高精度機器生產。個中涉及filament品質控制及熔斷變化等,影響應用效果。

ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-19 12:16

billymud 發表於 2013-1-19 11:57 static/image/common/back.gif
  師兄,前者可以在backyard手作坊製造,後者採用高精度機器生產。個中涉及filament品質控制及熔斷變化 ...

最緊要是沒有影響到聲音, 反正一般FUSE都是好平{:1_245:}

其實用直接焊接在電路板上FUSE的原因是:

1. 廠家減低成本;
2. 廠家減少工序; 還是
3. 最直接最短減少阻抗呢 {:1_342:}

billymud 發表於 2013-1-19 22:07

ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-19 12:16 static/image/common/back.gif
最緊要是沒有影響到聲音, 反正一般FUSE都是好平

其實用直接焊接在電路板上FUSE的原因是:


One and two!

ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-19 22:58

billymud 發表於 2013-1-19 22:07 static/image/common/back.gif
One and two!


的機賣得唔平, 又賣得唔多, 都要減低成本同減少工序{:1_331:}

http://www.hi-av.net/uploads/article/image/200901/20090105202930.jpg

billymud 發表於 2013-1-20 00:05

本帖最後由 billymud 於 2013-1-20 00:06 編輯

ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-19 22:58 static/image/common/back.gif
的機賣得唔平, 又賣得唔多, 都要減低成本同減少工序

賣得唔平都要減低成本同減少工序, that's business !!!{:1_343:}
$1 manufacturing cost => increase $10 selling cost = 10% less competitiveness ka~~

ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-20 08:58

billymud 發表於 2013-1-20 00:05 static/image/common/back.gif
賣得唔平都要減低成本同減少工序, that's business !!!   
$1 manufacturing cost => increase...


原來另一邊2個大電容側,有2個fuses是用fuse座的, 又唔係全部用"axial lead fuse"減低成本同減少工序 {:1_342:}

若是正常使用器材, PC同IEC都有fuses, 這種"axial lead fuse",是否好少機會會燒呢 {:1_342:} 如果燒了, 一般用家未必識換{:1_260:}


http://www.hi-av.net/uploads/article/image/200901/20090105203026.jpg

billymud 發表於 2013-1-20 11:32

本帖最後由 billymud 於 2013-1-20 11:36 編輯

ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-20 08:58 static/image/common/back.gif
原來另一邊2個大電容側,有2個fuses是用fuse座的, 又唔係全部用"axial lead fuse"減低成本同減少工序 { ...

C+Hing, couldn't you tell the difference between a post assembly (mechanically) and an electrical component ?{:1_333:}

器材vendors are not expecting fuses 燒了用家識換. ALL vendors expect to offer fuse replacements at charge$$$$ ! {:1_343:}
頁: 1 [2] 3 4
查看完整版本: fuse 套座

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。