billymud
發表於 2013-1-18 20:47
本帖最後由 billymud 於 2013-1-18 21:07 編輯
這些fuses是both end 套住 with pigtail cap.The pig-tail is welded (not soldering) for reliability.
The whole fuse assembly can be 攞出來, by desoldering the pigtail points on the board.it takes just 2 minutes; 容易呢 !
be noted that fuse filaments are soldered to it's end caps with a small piece of solder.The pig-tail caps were force-fit as a post process per customer
request.And, that's it.Never 拉開少少兩邊pig-tailcap 腳.Even 0.5m/m都唔可以; once pulled, the fuse is deformed and failed.
By the way, this picture shows those fuse filaments are in diagonal placement (對角線的).That represented a low-tech manufacturing technology (e.g. cheap cheap mainland backyard factories....) was applied.Replace it with a quality fuse from other "Brand" is highly recommended.
billymud
發表於 2013-1-18 20:49
本帖最後由 billymud 於 2013-1-18 20:55 編輯
ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-18 11:33 static/image/common/back.gif
現在冇事, 暫時唔攪住啦.
your picture shows those fuse filaments are in diagonal placement (對角線的).That represented a low-tech manufacturing technology (e.g. cheap cheap mainland backyard factories....) was applied.
Replace it with a quality fuse from other "Brand" is highly recommended.{:1_262:}
you can also buy fuse holders from Wah-Fai, SSP.$6 for two pieces la~~
with fuse holders, you've the freedom to apply discrete fuses, from $1/pc to $1,000/pc. {:1_352:}
ANWKLO
發表於 2013-1-19 10:09
billymud 發表於 2013-1-18 20:47 static/image/common/back.gif
這些fuses是both end 套住 with pigtail cap.The pig-tail is welded (not soldering) for reliability....
唔該晒師兄的畫圖解釋 {:1_245:} 請問filaments"對角線擺放"同"平衡擺放"的聲音有什麼分別 {:1_342:} 因為未試驗過!
billymud
發表於 2013-1-19 11:57
ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-19 10:09 static/image/common/back.gif
唔該晒師兄的畫圖解釋請問filaments"對角線擺放"同"平衡擺放"的聲音有什麼分別因 ...
師兄,前者可以在backyard手作坊製造,後者採用高精度機器生產。個中涉及filament品質控制及熔斷變化等,影響應用效果。
ANWKLO
發表於 2013-1-19 12:16
billymud 發表於 2013-1-19 11:57 static/image/common/back.gif
師兄,前者可以在backyard手作坊製造,後者採用高精度機器生產。個中涉及filament品質控制及熔斷變化 ...
最緊要是沒有影響到聲音, 反正一般FUSE都是好平{:1_245:}
其實用直接焊接在電路板上FUSE的原因是:
1. 廠家減低成本;
2. 廠家減少工序; 還是
3. 最直接最短減少阻抗呢 {:1_342:}
billymud
發表於 2013-1-19 22:07
ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-19 12:16 static/image/common/back.gif
最緊要是沒有影響到聲音, 反正一般FUSE都是好平
其實用直接焊接在電路板上FUSE的原因是:
One and two!
ANWKLO
發表於 2013-1-19 22:58
billymud 發表於 2013-1-19 22:07 static/image/common/back.gif
One and two!
的機賣得唔平, 又賣得唔多, 都要減低成本同減少工序{:1_331:}
http://www.hi-av.net/uploads/article/image/200901/20090105202930.jpg
billymud
發表於 2013-1-20 00:05
本帖最後由 billymud 於 2013-1-20 00:06 編輯
ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-19 22:58 static/image/common/back.gif
的機賣得唔平, 又賣得唔多, 都要減低成本同減少工序
賣得唔平都要減低成本同減少工序, that's business !!!{:1_343:}
$1 manufacturing cost => increase $10 selling cost = 10% less competitiveness ka~~
ANWKLO
發表於 2013-1-20 08:58
billymud 發表於 2013-1-20 00:05 static/image/common/back.gif
賣得唔平都要減低成本同減少工序, that's business !!!
$1 manufacturing cost => increase...
原來另一邊2個大電容側,有2個fuses是用fuse座的, 又唔係全部用"axial lead fuse"減低成本同減少工序 {:1_342:}
若是正常使用器材, PC同IEC都有fuses, 這種"axial lead fuse",是否好少機會會燒呢 {:1_342:} 如果燒了, 一般用家未必識換{:1_260:}
http://www.hi-av.net/uploads/article/image/200901/20090105203026.jpg
billymud
發表於 2013-1-20 11:32
本帖最後由 billymud 於 2013-1-20 11:36 編輯
ANWKLO 發表於 2013-1-20 08:58 static/image/common/back.gif
原來另一邊2個大電容側,有2個fuses是用fuse座的, 又唔係全部用"axial lead fuse"減低成本同減少工序 { ...
C+Hing, couldn't you tell the difference between a post assembly (mechanically) and an electrical component ?{:1_333:}
器材vendors are not expecting fuses 燒了用家識換. ALL vendors expect to offer fuse replacements at charge$$$$ ! {:1_343:}