ADA
發表於 2012-9-12 22:14
同價位買nad, Cambridge audio 會仲好.
同埋marantz D QC好差
steve_wongwh 發表於 2012-9-12 20:08 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gifNAD好就好, 但2年入2次廠.
CA除了夠重, 我搵唔到佢的"個性", 佢已經唔係以前的CA了.
HOHOHO
發表於 2012-9-12 22:20
同價位買nad, Cambridge audio 會仲好.
同埋marantz D QC好差
steve_wongwh 發表於 2012-9-12 20:08 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
同價位?
the 6004 very low price wor!
HOHOHO
發表於 2012-9-12 22:21
你用部馬仔6004,會唔會有小小浪費左部ATOLL呀?
tennishk 發表於 2012-9-12 20:12 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
CD6004 just the beginning la...... later and then will be...........{:1_338:}
HOHOHO
發表於 2012-9-12 22:22
重有喇叭呢
Tomy 發表於 2012-9-12 20:18 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
proAc
HOHOHO
發表於 2012-9-12 22:23
咁我會選擇馬仔都唔會買Cambridge啦! x 2
CA no way! I have used CA640 before. Need to repair 2 times ...
SkyGeo 發表於 2012-9-12 21:37 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
I just sure that this 馬仔 is made in Japan
HOHOHO
發表於 2012-9-12 22:27
Marantz啲機係柔聲, 舒服, 耐聽
如果師兄想要分析力, 大音場, 細節量, 咁就真係入錯貨{:6_18 ...
edm230 發表於 2012-9-12 21:46 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
how about my combination?
Marantz > Atoll > proAc
thank you
chakat
發表於 2012-9-12 22:44
其實真係睇師兄要乜。。我之前用CA740C都三年多,都未壞過。。。若講分析力,CA應該好過馬仔(申報我一向唔太起歡馬仔聲底),但若果有D畢值,不如上Atoll部CDP啦,咪仲夾聲!
sungyue
發表於 2012-9-12 22:52
{:6_195:}{:6_196:}
ericlpt
發表於 2012-9-12 23:15
Ching congratulations!!!
ADA
發表於 2012-9-12 23:22
其實真係睇師兄要乜。。我之前用CA740C都三年多,都未壞過。。。若講分析力,CA應該好過馬仔(申報我一向唔 ...
chakat 發表於 2012-9-12 22:44 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif我早3個星期先幫老友放左部CA740C, 佢重話平D賣俾我, 我試左一星期後決定唔要,
唔係唔好, 但不及小弟摩改過的馬仔好.