let's start with your gear first, 300 and 390.2 is different class anyway ..
fyi, my living room is in diamond shape .. hmm .. since the configurations (CDP & AMP) are completely different, it's hard to make comparison in detail ..
however, since I use the 2 channels as TV speaker as well, what I can tell is I found the bass suddenly overloaded (or boom) few weeks after i got the 300 (that's why i need to move the speaker away from wall), and the voice of news anchor is more solid than 390 for sure ..
in brief, i would say 390 is a bit less in mid-low which make the high feel "silky", 300 now is all round from low to high and i'm not dare to have a floorstanding until i got a bigger house .. 本帖最後由 sungyue 於 2012-3-27 23:02 編輯
Sunbrid 兄，請教你，你是前G0LDM0ND390，現YBA 300用家，究竟390同yBA300在聲音及聲色上有何分別。
樓主 ...
carcarman 發表於 2012-3-27 07:48 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
其實yba300我有幸在農場有其他客人試時聽過一次就只得一次,用1000 cd player推atohm gt1播放一曲'梁祝'小提琴版我只站在一旁也能感受到小提琴的密度連貫性和弦的彈力一一表現出來到大棚演奏琴聲通透有一種按琴鍵的力量鼓聲也有應有的下潛深度力量微動態突出最重要是我的in100沒有的貴氣能把整個人吸引....
說回goldmund390.2真的含畜斯文一點推toy tower像少女一般演奏提琴弦樂有一種飄逸感比較圓滑人聲驕艷到鼓聲就没有yba300的力量衝擊溫柔一點但也有貴氣吸引人
也就是選擇的困難兩部各有所長{:6_194:} 不過死人法國佬 d 金工就真係好輸 Goldmund。。。。{:6_194:}
Re: 有冇師兄用過goldmund390.2?
不過死人法國佬 d 金工就真係好輸 Goldmund。。。。{:6_194:}好聽D叫簡約
- 發送自我的 Galaxy Nexus 大板凳應用 ... 說回goldmund390.2真的含畜斯文一點推toy tower像少女一般演奏提琴弦樂有一種飄逸感比較圓滑人聲驕艷到鼓聲就没有yba300的力量衝擊溫柔一點但也有貴氣吸引人 ...
sungyue 發表於 2012-3-27 22:34 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
hmm, it's kind of gear matching i would say, when the gears are on similar level, you will find "harmony" 'cause non of them can show the weakness of each other ..
guess you might be fine with 390.2 + GT1 combo since the bottle neck is on 390.2 i would say, just depends on how soon you will change the AMP and CDP, I was just half year .. 不過死人法國佬 d 金工就真係好輸 Goldmund。。。。
Wilmer威馬 發表於 2012-3-28 00:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
really depends on what you are looking for, just for the metal work, it's just cost issue .. but for chassis design, YBA is way above Goldmund personally especially the 3 metal feet + rubber ring damping design, Goldmund just 4 standard rubber feet ..
fyi, Goldmund Cones was by YBA when he was still working for Goldmund .. really depends on what you are looking for, just for the metal work, it's just cost issue .. but f ...
Sunbird 發表於 2012-3-28 11:58 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
New Goldmund no more mechanical grounding? New Goldmund no more mechanical grounding?
Wilmer威馬 發表於 2012-3-28 12:01 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
you mean spikes?? following is how it looks like, you can see the rubber leg on left and right ..
http://www.gzhifi.com/zy/images/201106/1308988784886253058.jpg you mean spikes?? following is how it looks like, you can see the rubber leg on left and right .....
Sunbird 發表於 2012-3-28 12:26 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Goldmund was once famous about the chassis mechanical grounding, which is something how to mount the PCB and transformer to the chassis, and let all resonance pass to the chassis feet, not sure if they still have such structure since it is not only depend on the material of the feet can do.