avlam
發表於 2012-2-15 12:37
本來無諗住咁快買,點知計畫趕不上變化...
Lester 發表於 2012-2-15 12:33 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
初步結果滿意嫲 ?{:6_138:}
Lester
發表於 2012-2-15 12:38
回復 51# avlam
未有初步結果...
obee
發表於 2012-2-15 12:39
Wow, YS-Audio A2 SE. I am also thinking about it, only worrying about falling into the "tube trap" ...
sokwan 發表於 2012-2-15 11:48 http://m.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
He has considered that already
obee
發表於 2012-2-15 12:42
本來無諗住咁快買,點知計畫趕不上變化...
Lester 發表於 2012-2-15 12:33 http://m.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
你可以無視個變化,咁咪無事囉
avlam
發表於 2012-2-15 12:44
回復avlam
未有初步結果...
Lester 發表於 2012-2-15 12:38 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
唔係連線都未插呀 ?{:6_121:}
Lester
發表於 2012-2-15 12:49
回復 55# avlam
昨日係二月十四,大事不宜
sokwan
發表於 2012-2-15 12:51
I am not sure all class D amp. Some class T amps were no good, expecially for some model that was "popular" XXXXX 33 forum in 2004/2005.
I have been using Flying Mole Class D amp for some 7 years (with TAD TSM-300, Rogers LS 3/5A, Krix, KEF Coda 7), I feel satisfied given that it was just 6K.
I listened to Nuforce Ref-9 V2 SE on several occasions in some chings' set up (one used Audio Physics speaekrs over 200k). I did not have theexperience of 無晒尾音.
I also listened to another class D amp, Accustic Realty 1001 (drive a pair of old model B&W 8XX floorstand speakers), I found the performance is really great.
You might take some time to listen to it and judge it yourself.
avlam
發表於 2012-2-15 12:51
回復avlam
昨日係二月十四,大事不宜
Lester 發表於 2012-2-15 12:49 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
七月十四就話啫 !{:6_175:}
Lester
發表於 2012-2-15 12:58
回復 58# avlam
七月十四我ok wor, 可以試輪迴 同鬼太古
Lester
發表於 2012-2-15 13:06
回復 57# sokwan
吾知邊樹有得試呢
頁:
1
2
3
4
5
[6]
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15