設為首頁fbYouTubeWhatsapp頻道IG

Post76.hk

搜索
樓主: karsonkwan

[CAS音響] 試左十幾隻dac 終於選擇MYtek 192

  [複製鏈接]

45

主題

905

回帖

0

精華

星級玩家

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

積分
24454
 樓主| 發表於 2013-5-16 22:08 | 顯示全部樓層
chhanthony 發表於 2013-5-16 22:05
佢係唔係講個Beta firmware?

佢冇講firmware 問題,問我而家咩野setup,做乜要加word clock,諗住用咩野牌子。。。好多野吹
QNAP TS-469L / dCS NB
dCS Paganini DAC / Paganini Master Clock / 大草牌 10m Rubidium Atomic Clock
Audio Note M6 mk3 Preamp
Mcintosh MC452 Power Amp
JAS Audio Odin Speaker

45

主題

905

回帖

0

精華

星級玩家

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

積分
24454
 樓主| 發表於 2013-5-16 22:55 | 顯示全部樓層
Mytek 話用Clock 只會令聲音更差

Dear Karson,

I was asking about your target system, about the word clock source device.
In a few words: External clock source for Mytek Stereo192-DSD DAC will make its sound worse, not better.

Michal Jurewicz, founder of Mytek states:
"Frankly there is no benefit of using external clock with Mytek. The DAC has a very good 10ps internal generator 1/2 inch from DAC chip and this low jitter figure is impossible to achieve using external clocks and all the cables involved.

Also some clock vendors offer "atomic clock" as I suppose "atomic" sounds very marketable, but all this is also somewhat dubious. In fact this clock:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_clock

is really useful for long term accuracy of time measurement, does not really have any advantages when clocking audio data."

He adds:
"Designers of ADC and DACs are in business of providing most accurate digital conversion as oppose to accurate time measurement over long term.

If one is concerned with their song length that has to be, let's say, exactly 3 mins 00 sec 00 ns long with 0.001%, then they should consider atomic clock.  Everybody else concerned with sound quality should rather be looking at digital converters with built in low jitter oscillators. PPM spec means nothing in terms of clock usefulness for audio conversion.

Oven cooked crystal or atomic oscillators make a great marketing pitch but they are intended for scientific time measurement and have no impact  audio quality.  It's the short term periodic (phase) jitter that matters most and it's not atomic source or thermal stability that assures this, but a crystal designed specifically for low phase jitter.  These designs are different, they are low noise, not low ppm.

In our (Mytek) designs) we have used oscillators with down to 1ps jitter specs. Such specs can only be achieved by placing the xco very close (few mms) to converter chipset and by using special buffering and pcb layout techniques, dedicated power supplies etc. 1psec crystal is expensive, can cost $50 as compared to a $2 for 50psec but this is the only approach that makes a difference IMO. A digital synthesis system can also be designed to have  low periodic jitter.

There is no way that the most stable external clock box can provide psec jitter figures when feeding another box through dubious few ft long wordclock connection and associated buffer circuitry , grounds and power supplies on both ends.

It's unfortunate the myths about clocks have perpetuated so deeply despite easily demonstrable evidence (for example see: http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jun10/articles/masterclocks.htm)

When someone tells me their system sounds "better" with external clock I challenge them to run a sinewave distortion FFT. In most cases this test shows more distortion on external clock (as it should be expected when high end ADC/DACs are involved).

Yet these distortion are often perceived as audible "improvement".  

When somebody tells me "I connected the "Galactic" External Clock Machine and  all started to sound great, vocal came to front etc etc.",  I know they are talking about increased midrange grunge coloration caused by more jitter. I'd rather use a nice sounding analog gear to color the sound, doing the same with clock is possible but probably misguided.

Having said that there is some badly designed equipment out there that can benefit from external clock but this should be an exception, not the rule, they are just badly designed. External clock  may help a Digi box where a 50Mhz clock is sent over a foot of ribbon, but won't help our Mytek nor Prism nor Lavry.

FWIW Mytek makes a good standalone clock oscillator. We recommend using this clock as a central source to sync a large system, not as an external silver bullet box that would "improve" the sound through some psychoacoustic magic that cannot be scientifically explained.

My 2C

Michal at Mytek New York".

I hope this clears things up a bit.

Best regards
Adam Bielewicz
QNAP TS-469L / dCS NB
dCS Paganini DAC / Paganini Master Clock / 大草牌 10m Rubidium Atomic Clock
Audio Note M6 mk3 Preamp
Mcintosh MC452 Power Amp
JAS Audio Odin Speaker

4

主題

63

回帖

0

精華

進階玩家

Rank: 4

積分
1181
發表於 2013-5-17 00:03 | 顯示全部樓層
Interesting!!   

4

主題

444

回帖

0

精華

進階玩家

Rank: 4

積分
2357
發表於 2013-5-17 00:32 | 顯示全部樓層
benchmark dac2 輸在邊方面?

45

主題

905

回帖

0

精華

星級玩家

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

積分
24454
 樓主| 發表於 2013-5-17 01:16 | 顯示全部樓層
kvic 發表於 2013-5-17 00:32
benchmark dac2 輸在邊方面?

價錢-。-
我先前試果d全部係伶埋我本身部arcam 周圍去pk
我都係換呢部黎用住先,再慢慢upgrade,跟住會伶埋部mytek去pk。。。如果人地唔趕我出門口的話
QNAP TS-469L / dCS NB
dCS Paganini DAC / Paganini Master Clock / 大草牌 10m Rubidium Atomic Clock
Audio Note M6 mk3 Preamp
Mcintosh MC452 Power Amp
JAS Audio Odin Speaker

4

主題

444

回帖

0

精華

進階玩家

Rank: 4

積分
2357
發表於 2013-5-17 01:39 | 顯示全部樓層
karsonkwan 發表於 2013-5-17 01:16
價錢-。-
我先前試果d全部係伶埋我本身部arcam 周圍去pk
我都係換呢部黎用住先,再慢慢upgrade,跟住會 ...


簡約唯美主義者

777

主題

1萬

回帖

17

精華

白鑽玩家

Rank: 13Rank: 13Rank: 13Rank: 13

積分
815798

76 榮譽貢獻勲章76星級影音勲章76 榮譽鑽石勲章76 榮譽VIP勲章76 精選榮譽會員勲章76-FC 黑鑽石勲章

發表於 2013-5-17 11:40 | 顯示全部樓層
karsonkwan 發表於 2013-5-16 22:55
Mytek 話用Clock 只會令聲音更差

Dear Karson,

我之前喺CA問過Michal都係咁講,但有好多香港玩家話Mytek唔加clock唔得,你去家訪下最實際
Panasonic DP-UB9000EBK, Shield TV Pro 2019, Apple TV 4K, Acurus Muse 16, PSI Audio A21-M x 5, A17-M x 2, Yamaha HS5 x 2, Arendal 1723 2S x 2, Procella P15A x 2, Epson EH-12000B, Grandview Screen

384

主題

8883

回帖

5

精華

鉑金玩家

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10

積分
127857

76 榮譽慈善家勲章

發表於 2013-5-17 11:51 | 顯示全部樓層
karsonkwan 發表於 2013-5-16 19:15
NAIM DAC2
Benchmark DAC2
金廘+

WOULD YOU MIND EXPLAN MORE THESE BRANDs 輸在邊方面?

So that I can have better consideration

thank you
山無稄, 地無缺, 才敢與76絕!

45

主題

905

回帖

0

精華

星級玩家

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

積分
24454
 樓主| 發表於 2013-5-17 21:30 | 顯示全部樓層
HOHOHO 發表於 2013-5-17 11:51
WOULD YOU MIND EXPLAN MORE THESE BRANDs 輸在邊方面?

So that I can have better consideration

哇。。。我唔係高手。。唔敢係到亂up
QNAP TS-469L / dCS NB
dCS Paganini DAC / Paganini Master Clock / 大草牌 10m Rubidium Atomic Clock
Audio Note M6 mk3 Preamp
Mcintosh MC452 Power Amp
JAS Audio Odin Speaker

4

主題

127

回帖

0

精華

進階玩家

Rank: 4

積分
2334

76-FC 藍寶石勲章

發表於 2013-5-17 21:35 | 顯示全部樓層
Just a beginner, may I ask how about :
- 金廘+
- WEISS (202 ) (if you tried )

也輸在價錢上嗎 ?
50 字節以內
不支持自定義 Discuz! 代碼
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 成為會員

本版積分規則  允許回帖郵件提醒樓主

重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,Post76玩樂討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。Post76玩樂討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。權利。
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表