?? WHAT ???
BETTER MAKE COMMENT 'AFTER' VIEWING THE BLURAY !!
I'VE NOT YET WATCHED THE TAIWAN VERSION, I WON'T COMMENT ON ITS SIZE (22.6G) AND 'DVD?' QUALITY.
I DO HAVE THE US SINGLE DISC BLURAY VERSION (44G per www.dvdbeaver.com), AND THE PICTURE IS ABSOLUTELY SATISFYING (FOR A 1939 YR FILM)!! POSSIBLE REASONS FOR RELATIVELY SMALLER FILE SIZE:
1. 4:3 PICTURE FRAME (NOT 16:9, LESS DATA)
2. HIGHER COMPRESSION RATIO (FOR BOTH AUDIO/VIDEO)
3. OPTIONS ON SOUNDTRACK.
SIT BACK AND RELAX, FOR STANDARD 120" 1080P SCREEN OR 60" PLASMA, NO PROBLEM AT ALL (FOR US VERSION)! COULD SOMEBODY COMPARE THE US / TAIWAN PICTURE QUALITY.
PLS REFER TO COMPARISONS FROM THE WEB, IT'S ABSOLUTELY BLURAY QUALITY, MILES AHEAD OF ITS DVD COUNTERPART. FOR THESE KIND OF CLASSICS, THE FILM OWNER WOULDN'T MIND TO DO FRAME TO FRAME RESTORATION. RESULT IS WAY BETTER THAN SOME OF THE MORE RECENT FILM (eg. 'About Last Night' Bluray is really upscaled DVD quality, this film is not the same thing)
[複製鏈接]
發表於 2010-7-15 09:13
。你講緊隻係3碟裝美版，剩係隻套戲容量已經有成44G（即係台版1倍容量），SF就裝咗係第2隻度。一套戲bitrate愈高，理論上畫面愈靚。大家公認既天碟Avatar同Dark Knight平均就有成30Mbps，但呢套修復版只平均只得18.39Mbps。當然舊片唔可同新片比較，但係我講緊係劉兄介紹嗰隻單碟裝台版只得22G，重未知道有冇收錄SF，一套4粒鐘既戲放落隻單層BD度，你估畫質是否拍得住美版? 你估隻台版BD bitrate有冇18.39Mbps咁高? 即係話唔好用美版作比較，數字上已差好遠，但係最終最好緊係A/B比較啦。
樓主
