陳木勝遺作《怒火》RAGING FIRE blu-ray

陳永仁

jc2ssych 發表於 2021-11-29 12:33
傻人太多，永遠都講咗其他嘢。

Thanks for your confession

angusluk

美版聲正好多
畫面電影感好啲

jc2ssych

傻人太多，永遠都講咗其他嘢。

陳永仁

jc2ssych 發表於 2021-11-29 07:51
我同你講畫面電影感，你就搬去講電影故事政治含意。
牛頭不搭馬咀。

Very interesting
In the eyes of people on your political spectrum, even when it comes to watching a movie, nothing is more important than criticism of a certain regime. Even if the movie is downright mediocre, as long as it caters for your political stance, it's still considered to be a masterpiece. Well, well, well. What I have been emphasising right from the start is that, a movie can't be a good movie without coherence. For instance, if you want to make a movie that roots for a certain ethnic group, the story at least wouldn't be about how imbecilic or barbaric they are. They would look intelligent and charismatic. Disney is very good at playing the games, which's how Black Panther has made tons of money at the box office.

I never let political opinions outweigh the quality of a movie. I only care about coherence and logics. Even Hollywood tycoons  will never ever make a movie simultaneously advocating for feminism and the benefits of women getting sexually assaulted. So please stop emotionally extorting me by asking me to watch a very specific movie. The things is that , I watch whatever I find amusing. And watching movies you recommend or not, clearly has nothing to do with my knowledge of what it takes to make a decent film.

Ask yourself, would you watch a biographical film that features an European male as Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King or even Barrack Obama? Would you watch a remake of The Shindler's List that casts a bunch of Africans as the purported 6 million? I would be eternally grateful if Hollywood finally has the decency to make a movie about Holodomor explaining how a race that have been thrown out of at least 109 countries, commited genocide on 20 million Europeans by starving them to death.

jc2ssych

我同你講畫面電影感，你就搬去講電影故事政治含意。
牛頭不搭馬咀。

你要評論本地電影畫面風格，唔該你睇埋智齒先講啦。

mryu8182

怒火係我今年第2套入手的港產片Blu-ray
畫面 9/10 (Blu-ray嚟講好高水準)
聲音 8.5/10 (槍聲、爆破、動作場面既聲音都無得頂，頭半小時我比6/10，原因係有d對白唔夾口形，Overall我比返8.5/10，甚至想比9/10添)
故事 8/10 (劇情有一段幾新鮮，2小時冇冷場；補充：至於，題材方面，不討論，我估住後不會有這類題材電影了)
總結: 值得收藏

Mac

陳永仁 發表於 2021-11-25 08:51
You are just getting increasingly hysterical. Right from the start, you deliberately misconstrue e ...

wait for yr Japanese version

陳永仁

At least, 怒火 has the guts to address the fake-refugee grooming gang problems in Hong Kong.

陳永仁

jc2ssych 發表於 2021-11-24 17:33
其實你想討論定鬧人呢？

我只係對呢種比較提出質疑，因為 budget 唔同。然後你就將其上升為指控，粗疏地將 ...

You are just getting increasingly hysterical. Right from the start, you deliberately misconstrue every word I have said about Benny Chan and his movies. And everytime I debunk your absurdity with facts, you just get even more belligerent. This time, you can't even stop yourself from swearing. If you have to express your opinion in a foul language over something so minor, you are the one being uncivilised and running out of things to say. So how come you still reckon you are in any place to condemn me?

Speaking of low budget films, Following(1998), Christopher Nolan's directorial debut, only cost USD6400. In the eyes of so many high-quality moviegoers, it's way better and more intelligent than any of the repetitive MCU garbage. Not because Following(1998) only cost far less than even 1% of the production budget of a MCU movie, it's because Following(1998) is indeed a masterpiece and the MCU simply recycles the same kinda excrement over and over again. Which shows that movies should only be classified as good or bad. People just wanna watch something that can excite them, they certainly don't have the stomach for endless politically correct preaching.

三五成群(1999) is even far more economical than 十年, which completely meets your requirements for being a low budget, independent film. In my opinion, 三五成群 surpasses 十年 in everything on every level. The only reason why the former effortlessly outmatches the latter is that, it's not some kinda liberal propaganda that promotes degeneracy and morbidity, it's 100% based on facts and every cast member in it delivered outstanding performance. Good actors, a good story, and last but not least, good directing and editing, are what it takes to be a good movie. Which doesn't really have much to do with how much money is thrown into it.

Is 十年 a bad movie? To be fair, even I might not have been very gracious about it, I do find three out of five chapters coherent. Lamentably, the other two chapters which promote the racial extermination of my race and suicidal thoughts, really make me lose my appetite.
From my point of view , 十年 is a contradiction. I have never seen a movie this nonsensical, raising concerns about the survival of the local culture whilst promoting the demographic replacement of the indigenous people.

In nationalist movies like, 300 and Braveheart, we don't see the Greeks teaming up with Chinese troopers against the Persians or the Scots getting in line with the Mongolians/ Muslims against the English. We don't even see them complaining that their countries are too homogeneous or condemning themselves for being too racist whilst vowing to fight to the death to thwart a foreign invasion. Even in the face of Armageddon, true patriots don't get themselves bred out of existence with foreigners looking nothing like them , in exchange for getting conquered by a common descent. Except for the typical, anti-German,  WWII movies, that got funded by a tribe that got thrown out of 109 countries, we don't see any race fighting amongst themselves for the total annihilation of their lineage and the deprivation of their essential liberty.

See? I am very eager to talk about movies. I just happen to be much more harmonious

jc2ssych

其實你想討論定鬧人呢？

我只係對呢種比較提出質疑，因為 budget 唔同。然後你就將其上升為指控，粗疏地將電影歸類為「只有好睇和唔好睇」。屌，咁討論區仲討論乜九鳩？