回復Wilmer威馬
馬爺你諗左去邊 我地講緊基身(機) 你諗左去囡囡果度既 ...
qk8082900 發表於 2011-12-29 18:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
妖！你誤導線 o既。。。。{:6_126:}
我諗leo兄你依家套膽前石後組合一定又全面又好聲, 仲要高性價比tim ...
ltcHD 發表於 2011-12-29 15:33 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
我個套Cheap野點勇敢話好聲丫, 自己收貨算喇{:6_136:}
好正既聖誕禮物....
Could this amp drive well 4 ohms 86db speakers which Melody PM845 could not do a good job on them?
回復 65# sokwan
應該係冇問題的,不過都係交番比馬爺答你最好
Could this amp drive well 4 ohms 86db speakers which Melody PM845 could not do a good job on them?
sokwan 發表於 2012-1-4 11:23 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
出貨 QC 係用 2 OHM 全功率煲 48 HRS，如果冇冷气唔夠通風焗住哂建議最低 3 OHM，推 4 OHM 係石机基本需要，至於 dB，係對喇叭有几響，某程度上唔關 AMP 事。
但係 Melody PM845 推唔好 4 ohms 86db 喇叭！？你用緊 PM845？
A ching told who used the same pair of speakers as mine told me that the PM845 could drive the speakers well and claimed that no amp under 40K could do the job, including Accuphase. I almost want to give the speakers up since I have no money to those expensive amps.
I am thinking whether I shall buy a Yamaha A-S2000 to have a final try---but it is still an expensive experiment.
Wilmer's amp should be good. But how about its sonic character and is it good for classical music?
Wilmer's amp should be good. But how about its sonic character and is it good for classical music?
sokwan 發表於 2012-1-4 14:19 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
You can pay deposit and borrow back for home trial
Wilmer's amp should be good. But how about its sonic character and is it good for classical music?
sokwan 發表於 2012-1-4 14:19 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
有得先試後買wor , 試下先啦{:6_222:}
