perrybeckham
發表於 2011-10-7 22:42
回復 13# plnl88
多謝cfu 加分,今曰佢都有講,但唔係我呀{:6_146:} 我都想呢
perrybeckham
發表於 2011-10-7 22:45
c兄請問你部7005過左保養未??
CrazyBull 發表於 2011-10-7 12:29 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
仲未呀,所以舊屎要好好keep 住{:6_182:}
CrazyBull
發表於 2011-10-7 22:50
回復 22# perrybeckham
如果未過保養就柝部amp去改野, 會5會5包保養?
perrybeckham
發表於 2011-10-7 23:01
ching can you share some experience with the Power House Rhodium and Palladium fuses? and wha ...
celtic 發表於 2011-10-7 13:31 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
講真句,比較過鈀金及鍍銠係有小小分別,尤其在聲底,但唔算很大,加屎係更加發輝件器材特性及過濾;但有朋友用埋銠白金比較話聲音更加通透{:6_182:}
建議由拖版粒電源頭換起{:6_193:}
perrybeckham
發表於 2011-10-7 23:08
回復perrybeckham
如果未過保養就柝部amp去改野, 會5會5包保養?
CrazyBull 發表於 2011-10-7 22:50 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
其實話更換比較合適,粒fuse座無桿死粒fuse,有問題可以換番原裝果粒
R.C.
發表於 2011-10-7 23:23
回復 20# perrybeckham
其實我都無打算換amp o個粒!{:6_142:}
所以都係留返俾你出啦!{:6_235:}
celtic
發表於 2011-10-7 23:25
講真句,比較過鈀金及鍍銠係有小小分別,尤其在聲底,但唔算很大,加屎係更加發輝件器材特性及過濾 ...
perrybeckham 發表於 2011-10-7 23:01 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
So which one more suitable for power bar connecting to source/DAC
perrybeckham
發表於 2011-10-7 23:32
So which one more suitable for power bar connecting to source/DAC
celtic 發表於 2011-10-7 23:25 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
未玩過既就平平地用鍍銠先吧,因換左原裝個粒已提昇許多,團購果粒性價比高{:6_142:}
celtic
發表於 2011-10-7 23:36
回復 28# perrybeckham
yea, it is my first time to change the fuse of the power bar, but all my other audio equipment, DAC/ active speakers, amp already changed to HiFi tuning or Furutech fuses. but have no experience with Power House fuse
perrybeckham
發表於 2011-10-7 23:38
回復perrybeckham
其實我都無打算換amp o個粒!
所以都係留返俾你出啦! ...
R.C. 發表於 2011-10-7 23:23 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
等 換完pc粒也可同呢度ching分享下呢,pm 左{:6_182:}