chhanthony
發表於 2011-9-28 13:19
難唔難安架??
DLP真係實淨d個影像
鐵心心 發表於 2011-9-28 13:09 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
唔太難,用返之前個架同放隻幕落少少
你部JVC 750咁重正,攪掂記得叫我家訪
鐵心心
發表於 2011-9-28 14:40
唔太難,用返之前個架同放隻幕落少少
你部JVC 750咁重正,攪掂記得叫我家訪 ...
chhanthony 發表於 2011-9-28 13:19 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
有排搞=.=
750未必夠你4000咁利,不過佢就好滑,d黑位仲黑過我部先鋒{:1_348:}
chhanthony
發表於 2011-9-28 14:52
有排搞=.=
750未必夠你4000咁利,不過佢就好滑,d黑位仲黑過我部先鋒
鐵心心 發表於 2011-9-28 14:40 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
攪掂call我上嚟爆
要利一定DLP,但黑位係Epson同JVC最強
heero503
發表於 2011-9-28 15:23
我都打算入4000喎(因我無興趣3D)到時沙田友又可以聚一聚~
andy328
發表於 2011-9-28 18:41
{:6_195:}{:6_196:}
鐵心心
發表於 2011-9-28 18:43
攪掂call我上嚟爆
要利一定DLP,但黑位係Epson同JVC最強
chhanthony 發表於 2011-9-28 14:52 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
e家煩緊d擴散板點上天花{:1_331:}
chhanthony
發表於 2011-9-28 18:50
回復 36# 鐵心心
你個廳咁吉重要放咁多擴散?
鐵心心
發表於 2011-9-28 19:23
回復鐵心心
你個廳咁吉重要放咁多擴散?
chhanthony 發表於 2011-9-28 18:50 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
吉先要落#_#
chhanthony
發表於 2011-10-3 09:33
上星期試過用ColorHCFR校過下部機
可以同部W5000最後一次調教嘅數據比較一下
W5000
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-5Trsz6dd-F0/ToM0uit4w1I/AAAAAAAAEME/MoOjs4m-9P0/s800/W5000%2525201.jpg
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-JXVcdJGpPGA/ToM0uoaDgVI/AAAAAAAAEMA/Rq48ntsHmfo/s800/W5000-2.jpg
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-CpZG-kfkUho/ToM0u7x707I/AAAAAAAAEMI/3HYDTR373R4/s800/W5000-3.jpg
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-r8vlVvjC8zE/ToM0vKHwMqI/AAAAAAAAEMM/LmgtXdeBGcE/s800/W5000-4.jpg
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-tRbDTtapdNg/ToM0vYXaiFI/AAAAAAAAEMQ/LZWi7l_Ne18/s800/W5000-5.jpg
HC4000
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-REZQg7qkt4s/ToM2HTKACQI/AAAAAAAAEMw/fdaJT6P9Z0k/s800/HC4000-1.jpg
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-aWGrIDPkJx4/ToM2Hq5BgeI/AAAAAAAAEM0/QWQbkMLmcbw/s800/HC4000-2.jpg
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-RP0_diLKYeo/ToM2Hjd_rmI/AAAAAAAAEM4/z5FKzfvGskQ/s800/HC4000-3.jpg
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-D9pZPGqcJZ8/ToM2H9bAnHI/AAAAAAAAEM8/JW8oBOkl8Wo/s800/HC4000-4.jpg
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-oz2BlKoeMNo/ToM2IO8nHjI/AAAAAAAAENA/yVAYxRm5roQ/s800/HC-4000-5.jpg
係數據上W5000係更線性、更準確,而喺色域更加係由0%到100% color都有好好嘅表現
但以實際畫面嚟講,HC4000嘅高對比度同順滑嘅畫面比較W5000更加吸引。
dominickwok
發表於 2011-10-3 10:26
係數據上W5000係更線性、更準確,而喺色域更加係由0%到100% color都有好好嘅表現
但以實際畫面嚟講,HC4000嘅高對比度同順滑嘅畫面比較W5000更加吸引。
chhanthony 發表於 2011-10-3 09:33 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
C hing, you made a good point.
It would be even more useful if you can also show the color luminance performance of them for saturation levels from 0% to 100%, i.e. something like this (so it can further help to verify the linearity of color performance of them):