ProAc D18
有冇ching 用緊,可以分亨一下嗎?小弟想玩下細坐地,由b&w 805s 換 proac d18 .大家比下意見 其實805s都好難搵到對手嫁啦!除非你想轉口味啦!!!{:6_175:} 可能師兄 屋企深 書架唔夠玩 再講S系已經好耐了 換下新野玩 俾D新鮮感自己 有冇ching 用緊,可以分亨一下嗎?
小弟想玩下細坐地,由b&w 805s 換 proac d18 .大家比下意見 ...
lamswim 發表於 2011-8-6 13:41 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
坐地同書架一定有分別, 由其時係個氣勢同密度......PROAC D18 個咀形會比 B&W 細, 同人既比例比較接近.......但係兩者人聲都係甜美, 睇你自己LIKE邊隻 {:6_143:}
PROAC 低音比較斯文, 比較耐聽, 唔會下下衝埋黎 {:6_127:}
分析力我自己就覺得PROAC比較好, 就咁一放低對SPEAKER, TOE 少少 IN.......聽起來都唔會太差, 當然認為煲熟之後.....就要搵一個好既擺位比佢啦{:6_142:}
Ching, 你地方幾大呀? 或者你去SHOWROOM聽下先啦 {:6_175:}
係我心目中, 兩對SPEAKER都係好野. {:6_174:} 回復 4# bbocram
地方細.10呎x 10 呎. 而家對喇叭離後墻都有30吋.805S 中頻很好, 但高低就約左少少.昨天係視聽展聽左對PROAC 坐地,中高音很好,所以PATPAT 痕試下對細坐地.一來一出一入都係補少少.二來又覺得對805S 既木紋真係很靚{:6_212:} ,唔捨得.但對PROAC 外貌就真係麻麻. 木皮都係貼上去.時間耐左會好殘,好舊, 不過對805S 就不同,5年都係咁靚, 個心都係15又16 .傷腦筋{:6_209:} 回復bbocram
地方細.10呎x 10 呎. 而家對喇叭離後墻都有30吋.805S 中頻很好, 但高低就約左少少.昨 ...
lamswim 發表於 2011-8-6 19:29 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
去試聽左先啦, 所有SPEAKER都係用木皮啦, 如果保養得好.....係唔會殘嫁 {:6_142:}
我之前用PROAC 1SC, 用左差唔多4年......都係咁靚仔{:6_122:} 回復bbocram
地方細.10呎x 10 呎. 而家對喇叭離後墻都有30吋.805S 中頻很好, 但高低就約左少少.昨 ...
lamswim 發表於 2011-8-6 19:29 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
Hi c-hing, I also changed from 805s to D18!Still boiling now..805s was fully run in, thus vocal is a bit sweeter, but D18 sound can fill the whole room easily!No regret!{:1_253:} Hi c-hing, I also changed from 805s to D18!Still boiling now..805s was fully run in, thus voca ...
vvti@ 發表於 2011-8-6 23:19 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
好毒呀{:6_199:} 好毒呀
lamswim 發表於 2011-8-6 23:31 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
你都未玩好805S... {:6_194:}
只係轉口味啫~~~ 呢個原因就足以換個對~ {:6_193:}
頁:
[1]