係咪嗰個triangle嘅故事呀?
avlam 發表於 2011-6-22 22:34 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
係呀, 睇黎AVLAM 兄你都係上面留過唔少腳毛喎~~~
本帖最後由 avlam 於 2011-6-23 01:08 編輯
係呀, 睇黎AVLAM 兄你都係上面留過唔少腳毛喎~~~
shing517 發表於 2011-6-22 22:42 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
我都係第一次上去渣!{:6_136:} 話時話你都唸住買玩具咩?
我都係第一次上去渣! 話時話你都呢住買玩具咩?
avlam 發表於 2011-6-22 22:54 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
研究中咋, 冇咩筆直, 所以都冇乜得揀.....不過今日聽過atoll 100 推 sirocco 1.0, 真係正~~~係貴左少少囉....
我都係第一次上去渣! 話時話你都呢住買玩具咩?
avlam 發表於 2011-6-22 22:54 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
係喎, 我見你放哂D 喇叭喎, 有乜打算???
ATOHM SIROCCO 2.0 VS EALC 247 , CHING, 有咩意思,
邊對好D
Ching 攸楊即係邊樹?
Atohm Sirocco 1.0 夾吾夾旦機 {:6_122:}
回復 15# ak2008
I want to know too. If Atohm can compare with 247, then I may go for it cause it is cheaper.
回復ak2008
I want to know too. If Atohm can compare with 247, then I may go for it cause it ...
rictsang 發表於 2011-6-24 08:24 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
唔果唔計二手價我會揀2.0, 因為音色自然， 聽得舒服， 不過二手冇乜市場…
Elac VS Atohm is different = German's analyical VS France's romance.
I feel Elac has more bass from the cabinet. seems push out more bass to hear but the bass is not clear. High is crystal clear. Atom more nature and human.
depends on what you like. if you like exciting effect, go for Elac. if you go for vocal, feeling, go for atohm.
just my 2cents{:6_218:}
Elac FS-247 高低音伸延比較大, 尤其是個Jet高音, 好擴散, 低頻一浸浸的, 好鬼乾淨, 好有彈跳力, 有立體感, 動態大, 如果鐘意電子音樂多些, 例如電子結他, 電子琴, 喜多郎, 電子流行曲之類, Madonna, Lady Gaga 這些 pop music 會發揮好些, 會鐘意她多些.
Atohm Sirocco 2.0 自然真實, 音樂感強, 人聲出有感情, 好適合天然聲音, 如人聲, 結他, 鋼琴, 蔡琴, Eva Cassidy之類.
各有各好, Elac難推一些, 聽歌多撰Atohm, 聽歌看戲各一半撰Elac, 看看你的喜好 {:1_245:}
