後置選擇及擺位分享
轉見換左Klipsch 41 Mk2 都成三個月, 終於可以坐低寫下野.早前換左中置同Sub 仔, 立即發覺對用左成7年慨後置無聲, 扒完文之後, 又落鋪試完一輪, 始終鎖定 Klipsch. 原本諗住42Mk2, 但係同幾個鋪頭老世傾完, 佢地不約而同都話其實41 都應該夠我用, 最後都係聽佢地講, 要左41Mk2.
反左屋企, 立即換上原有後置的位置. 包圍感同Details都好左, 但老實講, 有D 失望, 因為並無予其改進之大. 之後再Tune, 再好D, 但始終無予其咁好, 早知要42 好過啦.
但心有不甘, 老師傅們既Suggestions 無理由咁差, 就開始改擺位. 其實之前我都唸左一大輪應該用2個細書架Speakers 以致定位好D, 還是好似OS3 果D 擴散勁D. 眼見隻41Mk2 得一個主音單元, 而高音在兩邊, 所以都係決定買多個架將佢指向耳仔. 嘩! 呢下改動雖然好麻煩, 但係絕對值得. D 包圍感同Details 立即出晒黎.
雖然42 可能會再好D, 但係依家 41 都夠玩 LU ching 整得好整齊！{:6_138:} 一係賣41出去買返42 41 ok!{:6_176:} 本帖最後由 wally 於 2011-6-12 23:11 編輯
回復 3# wantai288
唔會啦，據d師傅話，其實41 同42 唔會差太遠。當然我唔知差幾多，但係我估其實佢地聲底一樣，42只係多左一個主音單元，高音一樣係2個。所以41 同42 主要係bi-po 與否。視乎你點玩、點擺位。下次如果再upgrade, 就會再上多2級，唔會係42 Lu {:6_211:}
不過依家攪好咗個後置，又覺得個sub仔好似唔夠力。可能之後又覺得個前置唔得。之後又、、、荷包唔得。{:6_194:} 題外話
後置下面係咪bb床??
係上面掛個speaker好似唔係咁字全咁
雖則正路都掛得好實
但盡避免
不喜勿插 回復 6# ykkc
ha ha, thanks for the caring, its a play pan, not exactly a bed, but anyway, my kids don't play in there anymore, it now mainly keep their toys.
But to be honest, I don't worry to much about that side, I worry a bit more on the other side, because the stand just screw in to the ceiling, it has higher chance to drop than the other one that I mount on the side. And yes, that's also the reason why I always check on whether there's any sign of dropping down {:6_192:} 我喜欢后置喇叭装在耳仔后面, 这样才叫做后置, 而家最多叫侧置环绕. 我喜欢后置喇叭装在耳仔后面, 这样才叫做后置, 而家最多叫侧置环绕.
yongzhilu 發表於 2011-6-14 17:10 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
無錯，其實音響本身就是好個人的喜好同經驗。我都攪咗同試咗一大輪。不過，嚴格來說，雖然中文普遍叫做後置，但是無論是dobly or dts 5.1, 佢地都係叫做surround speakers. 如果是7.1, 左右兩邊叫surround, 後面果對叫surround back. But anyway, 無論佢地叫乜嘢，最緊要適合自己屋企擺位setting , 同自己喜好。{:6_238:} ching個bracket係邊到買呀? 我對41個位唔係咁好, 想加BRACKET
頁:
[1]
2