如果用緊av amp聽歌 , 當然先加int amp . 呢個改善大d .
里奧 發表於 2011-6-9 12:43 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
絕對同意，我而家就係咁
ps 師兄你套2ch setup都同我幾似喎
creek evo2 amp 有av bypass x2，
換得多又驚個頭有問題
哈哈 e+ 用石機舒服晒!!
kitsiu81 發表於 2011-6-9 17:38 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
咁又係, 所以我用左幾年蕉頭, 跟住而家又改左叉頭
之前我都諗過轉用石機, 不過始終鍾意膽機聲多d, 冇辦法 {:6_180:}
儲多dd錢先買int. amp. x n
雖然世上無一步到位呢回事. 但多d budget買amp之後, 唔會好快又身痕.
i will go for int. amp first too
then cdp/cdt/cas
本帖最後由 babuwa 於 2011-6-10 12:10 編輯
SURE int. amp la!!{:6_222:}{:6_222:}
can AV-bypass tim!!{:6_190:}{:6_190:}
707 to int. amp to push concept 6 will have much better improvement!!{:6_134:} {:6_134:}
SURE int. amp la!!
can AV-bypass tim!!
707 to int. amp to push ...
babuwa 發表於 2011-6-10 12:07 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
又放毒....{:6_126:}
of course int amp first!!{:6_190:}
it will improve both 2CH and AV performance,
for 2 ch, the int amp will definitely drive your concept 6 much better than 707
for AV, the int amp will take up the FR/FL channels so that your 707 can "concentrate" on the other channels, your whole system will be upgraded
dont think la, go go go {:6_208:}
本帖最後由 babuwa 於 2011-6-10 15:56 編輯
又放毒....
jackiewong518 發表於 2011-6-10 13:37 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
you ask ja wor!!{:6_174:} {:6_174:}
almost All Ching vote int. amp, buy la! buy la!{:6_222:} {:6_222:}
you ask ja wor!!
almost All Ching vote int. amp, buy la! buy la! ...
babuwa 發表於 2011-6-10 15:55 http://www.post76.com/discuss/images/common/back.gif
個個都話唔好買平既...INT.AMP
